Literature DB >> 16406914

Post-void residual urine volume is not a good predictor of the need for invasive therapy among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

C A Mochtar1, L A L M Kiemeney, M M van Riemsdijk, M P Laguna, F M J Debruyne, J J M C H de la Rosette.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the value of baseline PVR as predictor of the need for invasive therapy during long-term followup of patients with clinical BPH treated initially with alpha1-blockers or WW.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of a cohort of 942 patients with BPH treated with alpha(1)-blockers or WW were reviewed. Baseline I-PSS scores, PSA, prostate volume, uroflowmetry, pressure flow parameters and followup data were collected prospectively. Correlations between PVR and other baseline parameters were calculated. The 5-year cumulative risks of invasive therapy were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. After stratification of PVR by various cutoff levels (50, 100 and 300 ml), rate ratios between large and small PVRs were calculated using proportional hazards analyses.
RESULTS: PVR has weak (-0.2<R <0.2) correlations with other baseline parameters. With increasing PVR cutoff levels, the 5-year cumulative risk of invasive therapy for the large PVR subgroup, increases from 45% to 64% and from 15% to 21% in the alpha1-blockers and WW group, respectively. Large PVR yields a significant 2-fold up to a 4-fold increased risk of invasive therapy compared to small PVR in both treatment groups. In multivariate models these significant risk differences largely disappear, although a statistically not significant higher risk remains for the large PVR (greater than 300 ml) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, baseline PVR has little prognostic value for the risk of BPH related invasive therapy in patients on alpha1-blocker and WW. Only patients with large PVR have a 2-fold increased risk of invasive therapy compared to patients with smaller PVR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16406914     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00038-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  [Diagnostic and differential diagnosis of benign prostate syndrome (BPS): guidelines of the German Urologists].

Authors:  R Berges; K Dreikorn; K Höfner; S Madersbacher; M C Michel; R Muschter; M Oelke; O Reich; W Rulf; C Tschuschke; U Tunn
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Diagnostics of benign prostate syndrome].

Authors:  M Seitz; A Herlemann; G Magistro; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Non-invasive evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a clinical correlation study.

Authors:  S V Krishna Reddy; Ahammad Basha Shaik
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-09-09

4.  A Novel Nomogram Based on Initial Features to Predict BPH Progression.

Authors:  Lorenzo G Luciani; Daniele Mattevi; Daniele Ravanelli; Umberto Anceschi; Guido Giusti; Tommaso Cai; Umberto Rozzanigo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Defining the degree of intravesical prostatic protrusion in association with bladder outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Su Hwan Shin; Jong Wook Kim; Jin Wook Kim; Mi Mi Oh; Du Geon Moon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-06-12

Review 6.  The role of noninvasive testing and questionnaires in urethroplasty follow-up.

Authors:  Gareth J Warren; Bradley A Erickson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.