Literature DB >> 16406850

Should the draft chimpanzee sequence be finished?

Stefan Taudien1, Ingo Ebersberger, Gernot Glöckner, Matthias Platzer.   

Abstract

Owing to the availability of genome working drafts (WDs), current comparative-sequence studies are frequently performed on a genome-wide scale. In this article, we appraise the utility of WD sequences in the detection of genomic differences in closely related species. We compared human DNA sequences with draft and high-quality versions of the corresponding chimpanzee loci to reveal the overall high quality of the chimp WD sequence. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of the differences between WD and high-quality sequences we observed can be attributed to sequencing errors in the draft. Although we suggest methods to reduce the number of such false positives efficiently, our study emphasizes the benefit expected from finishing the chimpanzee genome sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16406850     DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  8 in total

1.  Comparative studies of de novo assembly tools for next-generation sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Yong Lin; Jian Li; Hui Shen; Lei Zhang; Christopher J Papasian; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Context dependent substitution biases vary within the human genome.

Authors:  P Andrew Nevarez; Christopher M DeBoever; Benjamin J Freeland; Marissa A Quitt; Eliot C Bush
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Exploring the origins of the human brain through molecular evolution.

Authors:  Eric J Vallender
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  More genes underwent positive selection in chimpanzee evolution than in human evolution.

Authors:  Margaret A Bakewell; Peng Shi; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Bioinformatic approaches to identifying orthologs and assessing evolutionary relationships.

Authors:  Eric J Vallender
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  Evolution of candidate transcriptional regulatory motifs since the human-chimpanzee divergence.

Authors:  Ian J Donaldson; Berthold Göttgens
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Heterogeneous genomic molecular clocks in primates.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Kim; Navin Elango; Charles Warden; Eric Vigoda; Soojin V Yi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  A genome survey of Moniliophthora perniciosa gives new insights into Witches' Broom Disease of cacao.

Authors:  Jorge M C Mondego; Marcelo F Carazzolle; Gustavo G L Costa; Eduardo F Formighieri; Lucas P Parizzi; Johana Rincones; Carolina Cotomacci; Dirce M Carraro; Anderson F Cunha; Helaine Carrer; Ramon O Vidal; Raíssa C Estrela; Odalys García; Daniela P T Thomazella; Bruno V de Oliveira; Acássia Bl Pires; Maria Carolina S Rio; Marcos Renato R Araújo; Marcos H de Moraes; Luis A B Castro; Karina P Gramacho; Marilda S Gonçalves; José P Moura Neto; Aristóteles Góes Neto; Luciana V Barbosa; Mark J Guiltinan; Bryan A Bailey; Lyndel W Meinhardt; Julio Cm Cascardo; Gonçalo A G Pereira
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.