Nina Singh1. 1. VA Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh, Infectious Disease Section, University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA. nis5+@pitt.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Late-onset CMV disease is being increasingly recognized as a significant post-transplantation complication. OBJECTIVES: To discern the impact of antiviral prophylactic strategies on the emerging syndrome of late-onset CMV disease in organ transplant recipients. STUDY DESIGN: Review of existing reports and published data relevant to antiviral prophylaxis in organ transplant recipients. RESULTS: Prevention of CMV using prophylaxis has proven effective and is widely employed in organ transplant recipients. However, late-onset CMV disease is increasingly being recognized as a significant complication in these patients. The more potent the activity of the antiviral drug and the longer duration of prophylaxis, the greater likelihood of late-onset CMV disease. CMV seronegative recipients of seropositive donor allografts appear to be at a uniquely high risk. A higher proportion of patients with late-onset CMV have tissue invasive disease. Late-onset CMV disease in liver transplant recipients conferred an independently higher risk of mortality in the first post-transplant year. Prolonged antiviral therapy may impair the recovery of CMV-specific T-cell responses. Preemptive therapy appears to be less likely to be associated with CMV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Discernment of the pathophysiologic basis of late-onset CMV warrants investigation. Preemptive therapy may be the preferable approach to CMV prophylaxis.
BACKGROUND:Late-onset CMV disease is being increasingly recognized as a significant post-transplantation complication. OBJECTIVES: To discern the impact of antiviral prophylactic strategies on the emerging syndrome of late-onset CMV disease in organ transplant recipients. STUDY DESIGN: Review of existing reports and published data relevant to antiviral prophylaxis in organ transplant recipients. RESULTS: Prevention of CMV using prophylaxis has proven effective and is widely employed in organ transplant recipients. However, late-onset CMV disease is increasingly being recognized as a significant complication in these patients. The more potent the activity of the antiviral drug and the longer duration of prophylaxis, the greater likelihood of late-onset CMV disease. CMV seronegative recipients of seropositive donor allografts appear to be at a uniquely high risk. A higher proportion of patients with late-onset CMV have tissue invasive disease. Late-onset CMV disease in liver transplant recipients conferred an independently higher risk of mortality in the first post-transplant year. Prolonged antiviral therapy may impair the recovery of CMV-specific T-cell responses. Preemptive therapy appears to be less likely to be associated with CMV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Discernment of the pathophysiologic basis of late-onset CMV warrants investigation. Preemptive therapy may be the preferable approach to CMV prophylaxis.
Authors: Julie H Ishida; Tracy Burgess; Michael A Derby; Pearline A Brown; Mauricio Maia; Rong Deng; Brinda Emu; Becket Feierbach; Ashley E Fouts; X Charlene Liao; Jorge A Tavel Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Kristy M Bialas; Daniel Westreich; Eduardo Cisneros de la Rosa; Cody S Nelson; Lawrence M Kauvar; Tong-Ming Fu; Sallie R Permar Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Julie H Ishida; Anita Patel; Aneesh K Mehta; Philippe Gatault; Jacqueline M McBride; Tracy Burgess; Michael A Derby; David R Snydman; Brinda Emu; Becket Feierbach; Ashley E Fouts; Mauricio Maia; Rong Deng; Carrie M Rosenberger; Lynn A Gennaro; Natalee S Striano; X Charlene Liao; Jorge A Tavel Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Elisabeth A Pitt; Pranay Dogra; Ravi S Patel; Angela Williams; Jonathan S Wall; Tim E Sparer Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2016-09-25 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Peter D Burbelo; Alexandra T Issa; Kathryn H Ching; Maurice Exner; W Lawrence Drew; Harvey J Alter; Michael J Iadarola Journal: Virol J Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 4.099