Literature DB >> 16406491

Mercury distribution in two Sierran forest and one desert sagebrush steppe ecosystems and the effects of fire.

Mark A Engle1, Mae Sexauer Gustin, Dale W Johnson, James F Murphy, Wally W Miller, Roger F Walker, Joan Wright, Melissa Markee.   

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) concentration, reservoir mass, and Hg reservoir size were determined for vegetation components, litter, and mineral soil for two Sierran forest sites and one desert sagebrush steppe site. Mercury was found to be held primarily in the mineral soil (maximum depth of 60 to 100 cm), which contained more than 90% of the total ecosystem reservoir. However, Hg in foliage, bark, and litter plays a more dominant role in Hg cycling than the mineral soil. Mercury partitioning into ecosystem components at the Sierran forest sites was similar to that observed for other US forest sites. Vegetation and litter Hg reservoirs were significantly smaller in the sagebrush steppe system because of lower biomass. Data collected from these ecosystems after wildfire and prescribed burns showed a significant decrease in the Hg pool from certain reservoirs. No loss from mineral soil was observed for the study areas but data from fire severity points suggested that Hg in the upper few millimeters of surface soil may be volatilized due to exposure to elevated temperatures. Comparison of data from burned and unburned plots suggested that the only significant source of atmospheric Hg from the prescribed burn was combustion of litter. Differences in unburned versus burned Hg reservoirs at the forest wildfire site demonstrated that drastic reduction in the litter and above ground live biomass Hg reservoirs after burning had occurred. Sagebrush and litter were absent in the burned plots after a wildfire suggesting that both reservoirs were released during the fire. Mercury emissions due to fire from the forest prescribed burn, forest wildfire, and sagebrush steppe wildfire sites were roughly estimated at 2.0 to 5.1, 2.2 to 4.9, and 0.36+/-0.13 g ha(-1), respectively, with litter and vegetation being the most important sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16406491     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Local deposition of mercury in topsoils around coal-fired power plants: is it always true?

Authors:  José Antonio Rodriguez Martin; Nikos Nanos; Theodoros Grigoratos; Gregoria Carbonell; Constantini Samara
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Insights into the mercury(II) adsorption and binding mechanism onto several typical soils in China.

Authors:  Xiuhong Ding; Renqing Wang; Yuncong Li; Yandong Gan; Shuwei Liu; Jiulan Dai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Volcanic mercury in Pinus canariensis.

Authors:  José Antonio Rodríguez Martín; Nikos Nanos; José Carlos Miranda; Gregoria Carbonell; Luis Gil
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-06-13

Review 4.  A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Jane L Kirk; Lei Zhang; Elsie M Sunderland; Martin Jiskra; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 5.  Potentially Toxic Substances and Associated Risks in Soils Affected by Wildfires: A Review.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Fernandez-Marcos
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-01-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.