Literature DB >> 16406007

Toward constructing an endophenotype strategy for bipolar disorders.

Gregor Hasler1, Wayne C Drevets, Todd D Gould, Irving I Gottesman, Husseini K Manji.   

Abstract

Research aimed at elucidating the underlying neurobiology and genetics of bipolar disorder, and factors associated with treatment response, have been limited by a heterogeneous clinical phenotype and lack of knowledge about its underlying diathesis. We used a survey of clinical, epidemiological, neurobiological, and genetic studies to select and evaluate candidate endophenotypes for bipolar disorder. Numerous findings regarding brain function, brain structure, and response to pharmacological challenge in bipolar patients and their relatives deserve further investigation. Candidate brain function endophenotypes include attention deficits, deficits in verbal learning and memory, cognitive deficits after tryptophan depletion, circadian rhythm instability, and dysmodulation of motivation and reward. We selected reduced anterior cingulate volume and early-onset white matter abnormalities as candidate brain structure endophenotypes. Symptom provocation endophenotypes might be based on bipolar patients' sensitivity to sleep deprivation, psychostimulants, and cholinergic drugs. Phenotypic heterogeneity is a major impediment to the elucidation of the neurobiology and genetics of bipolar disorder. We present a strategy constructed to improve the phenotypic definition of bipolar disorder by elucidating candidate endophenotypes. Studies to evaluate candidate endophenotypes with respect to specificity, heritability, temporal stability, and prevalence in unaffected relatives are encouraged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16406007     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  116 in total

Review 1.  The concept of FDG-PET endophenotype in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Emmanuel H During; R S Osorio; F M Elahi; L Mosconi; M J de Leon
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  The behavioral activation system and mania.

Authors:  Sheri L Johnson; Michael D Edge; M Kathleen Holmes; Charles S Carver
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 18.561

3.  Examining Procedural Learning and Corticostriatal Pathways for Individual Differences in Language: Testing Endophenotypes of DRD2/ANKK1.

Authors:  Joanna C Lee; Kathryn L Mueller; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Generalized genomic distance-based regression methodology for multilocus association analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Wessel; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Pathophysiology of depression: do we have any solid evidence of interest to clinicians?

Authors:  Gregor Hasler
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 6.  Searching for unique endophenotypes for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder within neural circuits and their molecular regulatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Francine M Benes
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 7.  Animal models of bipolar disorder and mood stabilizer efficacy: a critical need for improvement.

Authors:  Todd D Gould; Haim Einat
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Neural response to catecholamine depletion in unmedicated subjects with major depressive disorder in remission and healthy subjects.

Authors:  Gregor Hasler; Stephen Fromm; Paul J Carlson; David A Luckenbaugh; Tracy Waldeck; Marilla Geraci; Jonathan P Roiser; Alexander Neumeister; Noah Meyers; Dennis S Charney; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05

9.  Behavioral and emotional dysregulation trajectories marked by prefrontal-amygdala function in symptomatic youth.

Authors:  M A Bertocci; G Bebko; T Olino; J Fournier; A K Hinze; L Bonar; J R C Almeida; S B Perlman; A Versace; M Travis; M K Gill; C Demeter; V A Diwadkar; R White; C Schirda; J L Sunshine; L E Arnold; S K Holland; R A Kowatch; B Birmaher; D Axelson; E A Youngstrom; R L Findling; S M Horwitz; M A Fristad; M L Phillips
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 10.  Arguments for the sake of endophenotypes: examining common misconceptions about the use of endophenotypes in psychiatric genetics.

Authors:  David C Glahn; Emma E M Knowles; D Reese McKay; Emma Sprooten; Henriette Raventós; John Blangero; Irving I Gottesman; Laura Almasy
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.