Literature DB >> 16405940

The flash-lag effect is reduced when the flash is perceived as a sensory consequence of our action.

Joan López-Moliner1, Daniel Linares.   

Abstract

The flash-lag effect (FLE) is defined as an error in localization that consists of perceiving a flashed object to lag behind a moving one when both are presented in physical alignment. Previous studies have addressed the question if it is the predictability of the flash, or the moving object, that modulates the amount of the error. However, the case when the flash is self-generated, and hence can be internally predicted, has not yet been addressed. In Experiment 1, we compare four conditions: flash unpredictable, flash externally predicted by a beep, flash internally generated (and predicted) by pressing a key, and flash triggered by a key press but temporally unpredictable. The FLE was significantly reduced only when the flash was internally predictable. In Experiment 2, we rule out the possibility that the reduction of the FLE was due to the use of the key press as a temporal marker. We conclude that when the flash is perceived as a sensory consequence of our own action, its detection can be speeded up, thereby resulting in a reduction of the FLE. A third experiment supports this interpretation. The mechanism by virtue of which the detection is accelerated could be related to efferent signals from motor areas predicting the sensory consequences of our actions.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16405940     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Temporal and spatial constraints of action effect on sensory binding.

Authors:  Xavier Corveleyn; Joan Lopez-Moliner; Yann Coello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceived temporal asynchrony between sinusoidally modulated luminance and depth.

Authors:  Gojko Žaric; Arash Yazdanbakhsh; Shigeaki Nishina; Peter De Weerd; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The buzz-lag effect.

Authors:  Cristiano Cellini; Lisa Scocchia; Knut Drewing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Memory-prediction errors and their consequences in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Michael S Kraus; Richard S E Keefe; Ranga K R Krishnan
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Non-retinotopic motor-visual recalibration to temporal lag.

Authors:  Masaki Tsujita; Makoto Ichikawa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-19

6.  Pupillometric evidence for the locus coeruleus-noradrenaline system facilitating attentional processing of action-triggered visual stimuli.

Authors:  Ken Kihara; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Sanae Yoshimoto; Hirohito M Kondo; Jun I Kawahara
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-15

7.  The haptic and the visual flash-lag effect and the role of flash characteristics.

Authors:  Knut Drewing; Elena Hitzel; Lisa Scocchia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Do the flash-lag effect and representational momentum involve similar extrapolations?

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-23

9.  Effects of consciousness and consistency in manual control of visual stimulus on reduction of the flash-lag effect for luminance change.

Authors:  Makoto Ichikawa; Yuko Masakura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-14

10.  The role of differential delays in integrating transient visual and proprioceptive information.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; Cristina de la Malla; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.