BACKGROUND: This project examined the intermodal perception of temporal synchrony in 16 young children (ages 4 to 6 years) with autism compared to a group of children without impairments matched on adaptive age, and a group of children with other developmental disabilities matched on chronological and adaptive age. METHOD: A preferential looking paradigm was used, where participants viewed non-linguistic, simple linguistic or complex linguistic events on two screens displaying identical video tracks, but one offset from the other by 3 seconds, and with the single audio track matched to only one of the displays. RESULTS: As predicted, both comparison groups demonstrated significant non-random preferential looking to violations of temporal synchrony with linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli. However, the group with autism showed an impaired, chance level of responding, except when presented with non-linguistic stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Several explanations are offered for this apparently autism-specific, language-specific pattern of responding to temporal synchrony, and potential developmental sequelae are discussed.
BACKGROUND: This project examined the intermodal perception of temporal synchrony in 16 young children (ages 4 to 6 years) with autism compared to a group of children without impairments matched on adaptive age, and a group of children with other developmental disabilities matched on chronological and adaptive age. METHOD: A preferential looking paradigm was used, where participants viewed non-linguistic, simple linguistic or complex linguistic events on two screens displaying identical video tracks, but one offset from the other by 3 seconds, and with the single audio track matched to only one of the displays. RESULTS: As predicted, both comparison groups demonstrated significant non-random preferential looking to violations of temporal synchrony with linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli. However, the group with autism showed an impaired, chance level of responding, except when presented with non-linguistic stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Several explanations are offered for this apparently autism-specific, language-specific pattern of responding to temporal synchrony, and potential developmental sequelae are discussed.
Authors: Odette Megnin; Atlanta Flitton; Catherine R G Jones; Michelle de Haan; Torsten Baldeweg; Tony Charman Journal: Autism Res Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Ryan A Stevenson; Justin K Siemann; Tiffany G Woynaroski; Brittany C Schneider; Haley E Eberly; Stephen M Camarata; Mark T Wallace Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2014-12
Authors: Nancy C Brady; Christa J Anderson; Laura J Hahn; Sara M Obermeier; Leah L Kapa Journal: Augment Altern Commun Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Ryan A Stevenson; Justin K Siemann; Tiffany G Woynaroski; Brittany C Schneider; Haley E Eberly; Stephen M Camarata; Mark T Wallace Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2014-06
Authors: David Vogel; Christine M Falter-Wagner; Theresa Schoofs; Katharina Krämer; Christian Kupke; Kai Vogeley Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2019-01