Literature DB >> 16405597

Why does a grasshopper have fewer, larger offspring at its range limits?

M Hassall1, R J Walters, M Telfer, M R J Hassall.   

Abstract

Analysis of size of offspring reared through three laboratory generations from populations of the field grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus from 27 sites around the British Isles showed that offspring were larger towards the cooler-wetter conditions in the western and northern limits of the range. This variation had a significant genetic component. There was a trade-off between clutch size and offspring size between and within populations. Under favourable thermal and feeding conditions maternal fitness was optimal when individuals produced the largest clutches of the smallest eggs, but under poor conditions maternal fitness was optimal when individuals produced small clutches of very large offspring. Calculation of geometric mean fitness over time indicated that having larger offspring near to the edge of the range could be advantageous as a conservative risk-spreading strategy. As well as geographic variation in egg size, significant environment-genotype interactions in egg size in relation to temperature were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16405597     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00967.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  8 in total

1.  Ecotypic differentiation between urban and rural populations of the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus relative to climate and habitat fragmentation.

Authors:  Gilles San Martin Y Gomez; Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Geographic range limits: achieving synthesis.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Measuring thermal behavior in smaller insects: A case study in Drosophila melanogaster demonstrates effects of sex, geographic origin, and rearing temperature on adult behavior.

Authors:  Subhash Rajpurohit; Paul S Schmidt
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.160

4.  Grasshopper community response to climatic change: variation along an elevational gradient.

Authors:  César R Nufio; Chris R McGuire; M Deane Bowers; Robert P Guralnick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Adaptive sugar provisioning controls survival of C. elegans embryos in adverse environments.

Authors:  Harold N Frazier; Mark B Roth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  A review on trade-offs at the warm and cold ends of geographical distributions.

Authors:  Yvonne Willi; Josh Van Buskirk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Life history evolution and cellular mechanisms associated with increased size in high-altitude Drosophila.

Authors:  Justin B Lack; Amir Yassin; Quentin D Sprengelmeyer; Evan J Johanning; Jean R David; John E Pool
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Seasonal variations in body melanism and size of the wolf spider Pardosa astrigera (Araneae: Lycosidae).

Authors:  Jinjian Yang; Qijia Wu; Rong Xiao; Jupeng Zhao; Jian Chen; Xiaoguo Jiao
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.