Literature DB >> 1640487

Multiparametric prognostic evaluation of biological factors in primary breast cancer.

F Spyratos1, P M Martin, K Hacène, S Romain, C Andrieu, M Ferrero-Poüs, S Deytieux, V Le Doussal, M Tubiana-Hulin, M Brunet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An array of biological features related to tumor cell differentiation status, growth rate, and invasive potential have been identified as potential prognostic factors in breast cancer. We were interested in determining their relative importance in predicting patient survival.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the relative weight of the following four biological factors in predicting survival of patients with breast cancer: tumor cell DNA content (determined by flow cytometry), tumor cell proliferation rate (determined by thymidine kinase activity), expression levels of cathepsin D and urokinase plasminogen activator, and several "classical" clinical and histological factors.
METHODS: Selected from a prospectively updated database, the study population consisted of 319 primary breast cancer patients who received treatment and follow-up care (median, 6 years) in the Centre René Huguenin. To determine the profile of biological factors for each patient, we used frozen tumor specimens and (except for the flow cytometric DNA content assay) commercially available assay kits. We determined by Cox multivariate analysis the relationships of the biological factors to each other, to classical prognostic factors, and to disease-free and metastasis-free survival.
RESULTS: In the overall population, disease-free survival was best predicted by node status (P = .004), clinical tumor size (P = .02), and cathepsin D expression (P = .01), whereas metastasis-free survival was best predicted by node status (P = .0004), clinical tumor size (P = .009), and urokinase plasminogen activator expression (P = .04). In node-negative patients, thymidine kinase activity was the only factor selected for disease-free (P = .04) and metastasis-free (P = .05) survival. In node-positive patients, the number of positive axillary lymph nodes was the only factor selected for disease-free (P = .0008) and metastasis-free (P = .00017) survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective analysis has identified protease expression and tumor cell proliferation rate as important biological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Prospective clinical trials should be undertaken to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1640487     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/84.16.1266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  15 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of cell cycle parameters in infiltrative ductal breast carcinoma.

Authors:  B Uzarević; M Petrovecki; M Marusić; J Jakić-Razumović; Z Hutinec; A Sabioncello; S Gamulin
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 2.  Markers of tumor angiogenesis: clinical applications in prognosis and anti-angiogenic therapy.

Authors:  S B Fox; A L Harris
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Influence of the extraction procedure on plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2) and urokinase receptor (uPAR) assays in breast cancer tissues.

Authors:  C Bouchet-Bernet; F Spyratos; C Andrieu; S Deytieux; V Bécette; J Oglobine
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Patients with metastatic breast cancer using bevacizumab as a treatment: is there still a role for it?

Authors:  Ana Elisa Lohmann; Stephen Chia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-06

5.  Prognostic significance of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Knoop; P A Andreasen; J A Andersen; S Hansen; A V Laenkholm; A C Simonsen; J Andersen; J Overgaard; C Rose
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods.

Authors:  C Bouchet; F Spyratos; K Hacène; L Durcos; V Bécette; J Oglobine
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Prognostic value of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-2 in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  C Bouchet; F Spyratos; P M Martin; K Hacène; A Gentile; J Oglobine
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Stromal cell cathepsin D expression and long-term survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  H Joensuu; S Toikkanen; J Isola
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  External quality assessment of trans-European multicentre antigen determinations (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its type 1 inhibitor (PAI-1) in human breast cancer tissue extracts.

Authors:  C G Sweep; J Geurts-Moespot; N Grebenschikov; J H de Witte; J J Heuvel; M Schmitt; M J Duffy; F Jänicke; M D Kramer; J A Foekens; N Brünner; G Brugal; A N Pedersen; T J Benraad
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Oestradiol regulation of the components of the plasminogen-plasmin system in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells stably expressing the oestrogen receptor.

Authors:  A S Levenson; H C Kwaan; K M Svoboda; I M Weiss; S Sakurai; V C Jordan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.