Literature DB >> 16404696

A comparison of two citrate anticoagulation regimens for continuous veno-venous hemofiltration.

M Egi1, T Naka, R Bellomo, L Cole, C French, C Trethewy, L Wan, C C Langenberg, N Fealy, I Baldwin.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the safety and efficacy of two different commercial citrate containing pre-filter replacement fluids during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) in patients with frequent filter clotting.
SETTING: Four intensive care units. PATIENTS: Sixty-three critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF).
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
METHODS: We used a commercial citrate fluid (citrate: 11 mmol/L -fluid A) as predilution replacement for CVVH. We then changed to a new commercial citrate fluid (citrate: 14 mmol/L-fluid B) as replacement fluid and performed statistical comparisons. Replacement fluid rate was fixed at 2,000 ml/hour.
RESULTS: Filter life was 12.2 hour with fluid A compared with 17.1 hour with fluid B on average (p=0.0001). Mean post filter ionized calcium concentration was 0.52 mmol/L with fluid A compared with 0.40 mmol/L with fluid B (p<0.0001). Citrate intolerance led to cessation of treatment in one patient with fluid A and one patient with fluid B. Overall ionized calcium levels were higher (A: 1.18 vs B: 1.13 mmol/L; p<0.0001) and bicarbonate was lower (A: 22.4 vs B: 24.5 mmol/L; p<0.0001) during treatment with fluid A. Alkalemia was seen in 10 patients treated with fluid A and 16 patients treated with fluid B (NS).
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a simple approach to regional citrate anticoagulation for CVVH using a commercial citrate-containing fluid as replacement fluid. Increasing citrate concentration from 11 to 14 mmol/L increased filter life while maintaining relative safety and simplicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16404696     DOI: 10.1177/039139880502801203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review: anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy--heparin or citrate?

Authors:  Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten; John A Kellum; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 2.  Non anti-coagulant factors associated with filter life in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Brain; Elizabeth Winson; Owen Roodenburg; John McNeil
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  A retrospective review of the use of regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Anne Kit-Hung Leung; Hoi-Ping Shum; King-Chung Chan; Stanley Choi-Hung Chan; Kang Yiu Lai; Wing-Wa Yan
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2013-01-28

Review 4.  Clinical review: Patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Michael Joannidis; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Optimizing citrate dose for regional anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy: measuring citrate concentrations instead of ionized calcium?

Authors:  Patrick M Honore; Rita Jacobs; Inne Hendrickx; Elisabeth De Waele; Viola Van Gorp; Herbert D Spapen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.