Literature DB >> 16404582

[Analgesia of the axilla using a paravertebral catheter in the lamina technique].

G Pfeiffer1, N Oppitz, S Schöne, I Richter-Heine, M Höhne, C Koltermann.   

Abstract

A 62-year-old female suffered from therapy-resistant pain in the axilla after lymphadenectomy. The pain ranged from 8-10 on the numeric rating scale (NRS) despite multimodal pain therapy (non-steroid anti-rheumatics, opioids, physiotherapy, acupuncture). A paravertebral trial injection was performed preoperatively on the laminae of the thoracic vertebrae Th 2-Th 4. As the patient responded well, a paravertebral catheter was inserted close to Th 4 directly before the revision operation took place the following day. The case study describes the possibilities of eliminating pain segmentally in the axilla and an alternative technique to a paravertebral block (lamina technique).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16404582     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-005-0969-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  3 in total

Review 1.  Thoracic paravertebral block.

Authors:  M K Karmakar
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Thoracic paravertebral block.

Authors:  J Richardson; P A Lönnqvist
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine and its enantiomers during continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block.

Authors:  R G Berrisford; S Sabanathan; A J Mearns; B J Clarke; A Hamdi
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.166

  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  [Efficacy of erector spinae block versus retrolaminar block for postoperative analgesia following posterior lumbar surgery].

Authors:  Tao Tao; Quan Zhou
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-06-30

2.  Efficacy of superficial cervical plexus block versus cervical retrolaminar block both combined with auriculotemporal nerve block in parotid surgeries.

Authors:  Ghada S Mohammed; Alaa M Mazy; Nahla S El-Ebahnasawy; Mohammed N Mohammed
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-02

3.  The analgesic efficacy of a single injection of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar paravertebral block for breast surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Boo-Young Hwang; Eunsoo Kim; Jae-Young Kwon; Ji-Youn Lee; Dowon Lee; Eun Ji Park; Taewoo Kang
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2020-10-01

4.  Single-shot lamina thoracic paravertebral block with ketofol for modified radical mastectomy.

Authors:  Ambrose Rukewe; Oludolapo O Afuwape; Austin Ugheoke; Akinola A Fatiregun
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2016-10-06

5.  Erector spinae plane block for low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Hidemasa Takahashi; Takeo Suzuki
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2018-08-27

6.  Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Retrolaminar Block of Multiple Injections in Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Dexing Liu; Xinpeng Xu; Yuhang Zhu; Xingxing Liu; Faliang Zhao; Guobiao Liang; Zhaoqiong Zhu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Retrolaminar Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Pain Relief After Less-Invasive Lung Surgery: A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Takuji Sugiyama; Yuki Kataoka; Kazuo Shindo; Miki Hino; Kazumi Itoi; Yukihito Sato; Shiro Tanaka
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-27

8.  Anatomical classification and clinical application of thoracic paraspinal blocks.

Authors:  Shin Hyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-04-04

9.  Thoracolumbar retrolaminar block in seven dogs undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Kyratsoula Pentsou; Vilhelmiina Huuskonen
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  The ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block: volume-dependent injectate distribution.

Authors:  Marija Damjanovska; Tatjana Stopar Pintaric; Erika Cvetko; Kamen Vlassakov
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.133

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.