Literature DB >> 16404538

A water quality monitoring network design methodology for the selection of critical sampling points: Part I.

R O Strobl1, P D Robillard, R D Shannon, R L Day, A J McDonnell.   

Abstract

The principal instrument to temporally and spatially manage water resources is a water quality monitoring network. However, to date in most cases, there is a clear absence of a concise strategy or methodology for designing monitoring networks, especially when deciding upon the placement of sampling stations. Since water quality monitoring networks can be quite costly, it is very important to properly design the monitoring network so that maximum information extraction can be accomplished, which in turn is vital when informing decision-makers. This paper presents the development of a methodology for identifying the critical sampling locations within a watershed. Hence, it embodies the spatial component in the design of a water quality monitoring network by designating the critical stream locations that should ideally be sampled. For illustration purposes, the methodology focuses on a single contaminant, namely total phosphorus, and is applicable to small, upland, predominantly agricultural-forested watersheds. It takes a number of hydrologic, topographic, soils, vegetative, and land use factors into account. In addition, it includes an economic as well as logistical component in order to approximate the number of sampling points required for a given budget and to only consider the logistically accessible stream reaches in the analysis, respectively. The methodology utilizes a geographic information system (GIS), hydrologic simulation model, and fuzzy logic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16404538     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-0774-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  2 in total

1.  Nutrient losses by surface run-off following the application of organic manures to arable land. 2. Phosphorus.

Authors:  K A Smith; D R Jackson; P J Withers
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  A water quality monitoring network design methodology for the selection of critical sampling points: part II.

Authors:  R O Strobl; P D Robillard; R L Day; R D Shannon; A J McDonnell
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 2.513

  2 in total
  12 in total

1.  Water quality characterization in the Northern Florida everglades based on three different monitoring networks.

Authors:  James A Entry
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Seasonal rationalization of river water quality sampling locations: a comparative study of the modified Sanders and multivariate statistical approaches.

Authors:  Vikas Varekar; Subhankar Karmakar; Ramakar Jha
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Siting analyses for water quality sampling in a catchment.

Authors:  Jehng-Jung Kao; Pei-Hao Li; Chin-Lien Lin; Wen-Hsin Hu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-06-17       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Conductivity as a tracer of agricultural and urban runoff to delineate water quality impacts in the northern Everglades.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Donatto D Surratt; Dorianne M Barone; Nicholas G Aumen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Optimization models for siting water quality monitoring stations in a catchment.

Authors:  Jehng-Jung Kao; Pei-Hao Li; Wen-Shin Hu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  An evaluation of potential sampling locations in a reservoir with emphasis on conserved spatial correlation structure.

Authors:  Firdes Yenilmez; Sebnem Düzgün; Aysegül Aksoy
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Design of sampling locations for river water quality monitoring considering seasonal variation of point and diffuse pollution loads.

Authors:  Vikas Varekar; Subhankar Karmakar; Ramakar Jha; N C Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Assessment and rationalization of water quality monitoring network: a multivariate statistical approach to the Kabbini River (India).

Authors:  Musthafa Odayooth Mavukkandy; Subhankar Karmakar; P S Harikumar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  A water quality monitoring network design methodology for the selection of critical sampling points: part II.

Authors:  R O Strobl; P D Robillard; R L Day; R D Shannon; A J McDonnell
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  The impact of station location on water quality characterization in the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge.

Authors:  James A Entry
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.