Literature DB >> 16404451

Single-leg jump-landing stabilization times in subjects with functionally unstable ankles.

Scott E Ross1, Kevin M Guskiewicz, Bing Yu.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Factors contributing to functional ankle instability may cause individuals with the condition to land from a jump differently than those with stable ankles.
OBJECTIVE: To determine stabilization time differences during single-leg jump landings between stable and unstable ankle groups and to report the reliability and precision of time-to-stabilization measures.
DESIGN: A mixed design with 1 between factor (ankle group) and 1 within factor (direction) was used to analyze the comparison between our 10 subjects with functional ankle instability and 10 subjects with stable ankles. Time to stabilization (seconds) was the dependent measure. Reliability for time-to-stabilization measures of our 12 additional subjects with stable ankles were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2,7). Standard errors of measurements were also calculated for time-to-stabilization measures.
SETTING: Sports medicine research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANT(S): Ten subjects with functional ankle instability who reported at least 2 sprains and "giving way'' sensations at their ankles constituted the functional ankle instability group. Ten subjects without a history of ankle sprain injury served as healthy subjects. Twelve additional healthy subjects participated in the reliability study. INTERVENTION(S): Subjects performed a jump-landing test, which required them to jump 50% to 55% of their maximum vertical jump height and then land on a single leg on a force plate. After landing, they stabilized quickly and remained as motionless as possible in a single-leg stance for 20 s. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Anterior-posterior and medial/ lateral vibration magnitude curve fit time-to-stabilization.
RESULTS: Time to stabilization was longer for the functional ankle instability group (1.98 +/- 0.81 s) than for the stable ankle group (1.45 +/- 0.30 s) (P < .05). Reliability (standard error of the measurement) values for anterior/posterior and medial/lateral time-to-stabilization were 0.79 (0.15 s) and 0.65 (0.26 s), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Time to stabilization was longer for subjects with functional ankle instability than subjects with stable ankles. The ankle instability may have impaired the subjects' ability to stabilize after a single-leg jump landing. Reliabilities and standard errors of the measurements of time-to-stabilization measures were moderate and low, respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16404451      PMCID: PMC1323291     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  17 in total

1.  Functional instability of the ankle: differences in patterns of ankle and knee movement prior to and post landing in a single leg jump.

Authors:  B M Caulfield; M Garrett
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Changes in ground reaction force during jump landing in subjects with functional instability of the ankle joint.

Authors:  Brian Caulfield; Mary Garrett
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Detection of dynamic stability deficits in subjects with functional ankle instability.

Authors:  Erik A Wikstrom; Mark D Tillman; Paul A Borsa
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Prolonged peroneal reaction time in ankle instability.

Authors:  L Konradsen; J B Ravn
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Effect of coordination training on proprioception of the functionally unstable ankle.

Authors:  J N Bernier; D H Perrin
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Mechanical stability, muscle strength and proprioception in the functionally unstable ankle.

Authors:  L Ryan
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  1994

7.  Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research.

Authors:  C J Caspersen; K E Powell; G M Christenson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Postural control following inversion injuries of the ankle.

Authors:  P A Goldie; O M Evans; T M Bach
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Pronator muscle weakness in functional instability of the ankle joint.

Authors:  H Tropp
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Incidence and mechanisms of acute ankle inversion injuries in volleyball. A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  R Bahr; R Karlsen; O Lian; R V Ovrebø
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of postural control and lateral ankle instability, part I: can deficits be detected with instrumented testing.

Authors:  Patrick O McKeon; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  INFLUENCE OF INJURY ON DYNAMIC POSTURAL CONTROL IN RUNNERS.

Authors:  Stacey Meardon; Anna Klusendorf; Thomas Kernozek
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06

3.  Lower extremity biomechanics in athletes with ankle instability after a 6-week integrated training program.

Authors:  Pi-Yin Huang; Wen-Ling Chen; Cheng-Feng Lin; Heng-Ju Lee
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Comparison of dynamic postural stability scores between athletes with and without chronic ankle instability during lateral jump landing.

Authors:  Zeinab Shiravi; Azadeh Shadmehr; Saeed Talebian Moghadam; Behrouz Attarbashi Moghadam
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

5.  Injury risk management plan for volleyball athletes.

Authors:  Lachlan P James; Vincent G Kelly; Emma M Beckman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Factors Contributing to Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Cassandra Thompson; Siobhan Schabrun; Rick Romero; Andrea Bialocerkowski; Jaap van Dieen; Paul Marshall
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Differential ability of selected postural-control measures in the prediction of chronic ankle instability status.

Authors:  Danielle Knapp; Sae Yong Lee; Lisa Chinn; Susan A Saliba; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Treatment of common deficits associated with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Alison Holmes; Eamonn Delahunt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Ankle bracing, fatigue, and time to stabilization in collegiate volleyball athletes.

Authors:  Megan Y Shaw; Phillip A Gribble; Jamie L Frye
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Megan N Houston; Johanna M Hoch; Matthew C Hoch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.