Literature DB >> 16404256

Survival of diced cartilage grafts: an experimental study.

Kevin A Brenner1, Michael P McConnell, Gregory R D Evans, Jay W Calvert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery has recently undergone a dramatic resurgence. Some authors recommend wrapping diced cartilage with oxidized methylcellulose (i.e., Surgicel). Others prefer wrapping diced cartilage with autogenous deep temporal fascia. This study was designed to compare the behavior of diced cartilage grafts as an isolated entity or when wrapped with either Surgicel or deep temporal fascia.
METHODS: Septal cartilage and deep temporal fascia were obtained from five patients in this institutional review board-approved study. The cartilage was diced into 0.5-mm pieces and implanted into subcutaneous dorsal skin pockets of Rowlett nude rats as isolated diced cartilage grafts, or wrapped in Surgicel or deep temporal fascia. Pieces of Surgicel and fascia were implanted alone as controls. The specimens were harvested at 8 weeks; processed by thin-section histology; stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, glial fibrillary acidic protein, safranin-O, and Evans van Gieson; and evaluated to determine cartilage viability and architectural characteristics.
RESULTS: Diced cartilage wrapped in Surgicel yielded the lowest percentage viability and minimal staining with hematoxylin and eosin, trichrome tissue, safranin-O, and Evans van Gieson stains. Diced cartilage grafts wrapped in fascia had the greatest percentage of viable cartilage. The grafts wrapped in deep temporal fascia also demonstrated the strongest staining with the aforementioned stains. Differences in uptake of glial fibrillary acidic protein were not noticeable between the three groups. However, absolute numbers of nucleated lacunae and basophilic lacunae were significantly higher for grafts wrapped in deep temporal fascia.
CONCLUSIONS: Diced cartilage grafts have reemerged as a viable method for nasal reconstruction in both primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Wrapping diced cartilage specimens contains the individual pieces and facilitates graft placement. Surgicel wraps appear to incite an inflammatory response and subsequent absorption of the cartilage. Fascia wraps appear to minimize inflammatory responses to the cartilage, thereby preserving healthy cartilage. This study demonstrates that deep temporal fascia is the preferred envelope with which to facilitate graft containment and maintain chondrocyte viability of diced cartilage grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16404256     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000195082.38311.f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  15 in total

1.  Autogenous dorsal reconstruction: maximizing the utility of diced cartilage and fascia.

Authors:  Jay Calvert; Kevin Brenner
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Use of a fibrinogen-thrombin sponge in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  A Berghaus; M San Nicoló; C Jacobi
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Crushed Cartilage and Autologous Fat for Dorsal Nasal Refinement.

Authors:  Arvind U Gowda; Navid Pourtaheri; Kitae E Park; Omar Allam; Seija Maniskas; Yassmin Parsaei; Derek M Steinbacher
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Sliced vs crushed cartilage for camouflage: long-term graft survival and histological outcomes.

Authors:  Onur Ergun; Hatice Çelik; Naciye Dilara Zeybek; Jale Karakaya
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Study of Outcome of an Implanted Autologous Auricular Cartilage: A Preliminary Experimental Research in Rabbits.

Authors:  B P Belaldavar; R S Mudhol; Vijaylaxmi Dhorigol; Chetan Belaldavar; Satish Desai; Rishav Garg; Onkar Deshmukh; Mohit Sinha; S Ganesh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-17

6.  The comparison of the viability of crushed, morselized and diced cartilage grafts: a confocal microscopic study.

Authors:  Gurkan Kayabasoglu; Elvan Ozbek; Sevinc Yanar; Fikrettin Sahin; Osman Nuri Keles; Mahmut Sinan Yilmaz; Mehmet Guven
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Comparison of autogeneous and homogeneous nasal dorsal onlay grafts in an experimental design.

Authors:  Kenan Selçuk Tuncay; Emre Günbey; Gülçin Şimşek; Baran Acar; Rıza Murat Karasen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Characterization of Injury Induced by Routine Surgical Manipulations of Nasal Septal Cartilage.

Authors:  William W Thomas; Robert M Brody; Abdullah D Alotaibi; Emilie C Rabut; Noam A Cohen; Robert Lyman; Milos Kovacevic; Oren Friedman; George R Dodge
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

9.  Risks and complications in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Gerhard Rettinger
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

10.  Implants for reconstructive surgery of the nose and ears.

Authors:  Alexander Berghaus
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.