UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE AND CONTEXT: Our objective was to examine predictability of reproductive hormone concentrations for bone mineral density (BMD) loss during the menopausal transition. DESIGN: We conducted a longitudinal (five annual examinations), multiple-site (n = 5) cohort study, the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). PARTICIPANTS: Participants included, at baseline, 2311 premenopausal or early perimenopausal African-American, Caucasian, Chinese, and Japanese women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed annual dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry lumbar spine and total hip BMD measures, with endogenous estradiol (E2), FSH, androgens, and self-reported menstrual bleeding patterns. RESULTS: Over the 4-yr period, lumbar spine BMD loss was 5.6% in natural postmenopause, 3.9% in surgical postmenopause, or 3.2% in late perimenopause. Baseline FSH concentrations, subsequent FSH levels, and their interaction predicted 4-yr BMD loss. If baseline FSH was less than 25 mIU/ml, higher follow-up FSH (>70 mIU/ml) predicted a 4-yr spine BMD loss of -0.05 g/cm(2). If baseline FSH values were more than 35-45 mIU/ml, lower follow-up FSH (i.e. 40-50 mIU/ml) predicted a -0.05 g/cm(2) 4-yr spine BMD loss. Charts show amounts of predicted BMD losses with combinations of baseline FSH values and FSH levels over time. E2 concentrations less than 35 pg/ml were associated with lower BMD, but annual E2 measures and changes did not predict BMD loss. Testosterone, free androgen index, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations were not significantly associated with BMD loss. CONCLUSIONS: Spine and hip BMD losses during the menopause transition were most strongly related to the interaction between initial FSH levels and longitudinal FSH changes and not to E2 or androgen levels or changes.
UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE AND CONTEXT: Our objective was to examine predictability of reproductive hormone concentrations for bone mineral density (BMD) loss during the menopausal transition. DESIGN: We conducted a longitudinal (five annual examinations), multiple-site (n = 5) cohort study, the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). PARTICIPANTS: Participants included, at baseline, 2311 premenopausal or early perimenopausal African-American, Caucasian, Chinese, and Japanese women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed annual dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry lumbar spine and total hip BMD measures, with endogenous estradiol (E2), FSH, androgens, and self-reported menstrual bleeding patterns. RESULTS: Over the 4-yr period, lumbar spine BMD loss was 5.6% in natural postmenopause, 3.9% in surgical postmenopause, or 3.2% in late perimenopause. Baseline FSH concentrations, subsequent FSH levels, and their interaction predicted 4-yr BMD loss. If baseline FSH was less than 25 mIU/ml, higher follow-up FSH (>70 mIU/ml) predicted a 4-yr spine BMD loss of -0.05 g/cm(2). If baseline FSH values were more than 35-45 mIU/ml, lower follow-up FSH (i.e. 40-50 mIU/ml) predicted a -0.05 g/cm(2) 4-yr spine BMD loss. Charts show amounts of predicted BMD losses with combinations of baseline FSH values and FSH levels over time. E2 concentrations less than 35 pg/ml were associated with lower BMD, but annual E2 measures and changes did not predict BMD loss. Testosterone, free androgen index, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations were not significantly associated with BMD loss. CONCLUSIONS: Spine and hip BMD losses during the menopause transition were most strongly related to the interaction between initial FSH levels and longitudinal FSH changes and not to E2 or androgen levels or changes.
Authors: Siobán D Harlow; Margery Gass; Janet E Hall; Roger Lobo; Pauline Maki; Robert W Rebar; Sherry Sherman; Patrick M Sluss; Tobie J de Villiers Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Karl J Jepsen; Andrew Kozminski; Erin Mr Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; Robert W Goulet; Sioban D Harlow; Jane A Cauley; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; Susan J Diem; Kristine Ruppert; Yin Juan Lian; Chih-Chin Liu; Alyssa Wohlfart; Gail A Greendale; Joel S Finkelstein Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Li Sun; Zhiyuan Zhang; Ling-Ling Zhu; Yuanzhen Peng; Xuan Liu; Jianhua Li; Manasi Agrawal; Lisa J Robinson; Jameel Iqbal; Harry C Blair; Mone Zaidi Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Lynda D Lisabeth; Alexa S Beiser; Devin L Brown; Joanne M Murabito; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Philip A Wolf Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mone Zaidi; Harry C Blair; Jameel Iqbal; Terry F Davies; Ling Ling Zhu; Alberta Zallone; Li Sun Journal: Curr Rheumatol Rep Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.592