Literature DB >> 16403793

Using a state-space model with hidden variables to infer transcription factor activities.

Zheng Li1, Stephen M Shaw, Matthew J Yedwabnick, Christina Chan.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: In a gene regulatory network, genes are typically regulated by transcription factors (TFs). Transcription factor activity (TFA) is more difficult to measure than gene expression levels are. Other models have extracted information about TFA from gene expression data, but without explicitly modeling feedback from the genes. We present a state-space model (SSM) with hidden variables. The hidden variables include regulatory motifs in the gene network, such as feedback loops and auto-regulation, making SSM a useful complement to existing models.
RESULTS: A gene regulatory network incorporating, for example, feed-forward loops, auto-regulation and multiple-inputs was constructed with an SSM model. First, the gene expression data were simulated by SSM and used to infer the TFAs. The ability of SSM to infer TFAs was evaluated by comparing the profiles of the inferred and simulated TFAs. Second, SSM was applied to gene expression data obtained from Escherichia coli K12 undergoing a carbon source transition and from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. The inferred activity profile for each TF was validated either by measurement or by activity information from the literature. The SSM model provides a probabilistic framework to simulate gene regulatory networks and to infer activity profiles of hidden variables. AVAILABILITY: Supplementary data and Matlab code will be made available at the URL below. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://www.chems.msu.edu/groups/chan/ssm.zip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16403793     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  12 in total

1.  Using a state-space model and location analysis to infer time-delayed regulatory networks.

Authors:  Chushin Koh; Fang-Xiang Wu; Gopalan Selvaraj; Anthony J Kusalik
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2009-10-15

2.  Reconstructing genome-wide regulatory network of E. coli using transcriptome data and predicted transcription factor activities.

Authors:  Yao Fu; Laura R Jarboe; Julie A Dickerson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Sparse Regulatory Networks.

Authors:  Gareth M James; Chiara Sabatti; Nengfeng Zhou; Ji Zhu
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 4.  Mathematical modeling: bridging the gap between concept and realization in synthetic biology.

Authors:  Yuting Zheng; Ganesh Sriram
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-30

5.  Differential reconstructed gene interaction networks for deriving toxicity threshold in chemical risk assessment.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Andrew Maxwell; Xiaowei Zhang; Nan Wang; Edward J Perkins; Chaoyang Zhang; Ping Gong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks through genomics data.

Authors:  Ning Sun; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Reverse Engineering of Genome-wide Gene Regulatory Networks from Gene Expression Data.

Authors:  Zhi-Ping Liu
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.236

8.  Bayesian model-based inference of transcription factor activity.

Authors:  Simon Rogers; Raya Khanin; Mark Girolami
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Dynamical pathway analysis.

Authors:  Hao Xiong; Yoonsuck Choe
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2008-01-27

10.  A systematic approach to detecting transcription factors in response to environmental stresses.

Authors:  Li-Hsieh Lin; Hsiao-Ching Lee; Wen-Hsiung Li; Bor-Sen Chen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.