BACKGROUND: A recent audit indicated that a substantial proportion of men who have sex with men (MSM) were not screened for rectal gonorrhoea and chlamydia at the Melbourne Sexual Health Clinic, Melbourne, Australia. In response, screening guidelines for MSM were introduced at the clinic using a computer reminder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the guidelines and alert on screening MSM for gonorrhoea and chlamydia. METHODS: The medical records of MSM were reviewed for gonorrhoea and chlamydia screening by site (pharyngeal, urethral and rectal), four months before the implementation of the guidelines and alert (July to October 2002), and one year thereafter (beginning November 2002). RESULTS: After the introduction of the guidelines there was a significant increase in rectal chlamydia testing (55% to 67%, P < 0.001), and significant reduction in pharyngeal chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing (65% to 28%, P < 0.001, and 83% to 76%, P = 0.015 respectively). The proportion of tests that were positive by any site did not change (7% to 7%). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a computer reminder for new guidelines was temporally associated with screening that conformed more closely to clinical guidelines.
BACKGROUND: A recent audit indicated that a substantial proportion of men who have sex with men (MSM) were not screened for rectal gonorrhoea and chlamydia at the Melbourne Sexual Health Clinic, Melbourne, Australia. In response, screening guidelines for MSM were introduced at the clinic using a computer reminder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the guidelines and alert on screening MSM for gonorrhoea and chlamydia. METHODS: The medical records of MSM were reviewed for gonorrhoea and chlamydia screening by site (pharyngeal, urethral and rectal), four months before the implementation of the guidelines and alert (July to October 2002), and one year thereafter (beginning November 2002). RESULTS: After the introduction of the guidelines there was a significant increase in rectal chlamydia testing (55% to 67%, P < 0.001), and significant reduction in pharyngeal chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing (65% to 28%, P < 0.001, and 83% to 76%, P = 0.015 respectively). The proportion of tests that were positive by any site did not change (7% to 7%). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a computer reminder for new guidelines was temporally associated with screening that conformed more closely to clinical guidelines.
Authors: Monica E Patton; Robert D Kirkcaldy; Douglas C Chang; Stephanie Markman; Marilyn Yellowman; Emiko Petrosky; Laura Adams; Candice Robinson; Akash Gupta; Melanie M Taylor Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Denton Callander; Christopher Bourne; Handan Wand; Mark Stoové; Jane S Hocking; John de Wit; John M Kaldor; Basil Donovan; Catherine Pell; Robert Finlayson; David Baker; Bradley Forssman; B K Tee; Bill Kefalas; Tim Duck; Rebecca Guy Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2018-11-06
Authors: Dyani Lewis; Danielle C Newton; Rebecca J Guy; Hammad Ali; Marcus Y Chen; Christopher K Fairley; Jane S Hocking Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 3.090