BACKGROUND: Major complaints of many patients with olfactory dysfunction relate to the impairment of quality of life. Nevertheless, it is unclear to what extent there is a correlation between ratings of olfactory abilities/impairment and olfactory function. METHODS: Patients with olfactory dysfunction (n = 152) were examined psychometrically using the "Sniffin' Sticks" test battery. Ratings of olfactory function and ratings of impairment were recorded using visual analog scales. RESULTS: Following standardized olfactory testing, 78 of the 152 patients were categorized as functionally anosmic, 64 as hyposmic, and 10 as normosmic. Groups differed significantly with regard to ratings of olfactory function. Functionally anosmic patients rated impairment to be significantly higher compared with hyposmic and normosmic patients. Ratings of olfactory function correlated significantly with measured olfactory function (r = +0.57) and ratings of impairment (r = -0.30). CONCLUSION: There was a moderate correlation between ratings and measures of olfactory function. On average, functionally anosmic patients recognized their olfactory loss, although, on an individual basis, there were striking differences between measures and ratings of olfactory function.
BACKGROUND: Major complaints of many patients with olfactory dysfunction relate to the impairment of quality of life. Nevertheless, it is unclear to what extent there is a correlation between ratings of olfactory abilities/impairment and olfactory function. METHODS:Patients with olfactory dysfunction (n = 152) were examined psychometrically using the "Sniffin' Sticks" test battery. Ratings of olfactory function and ratings of impairment were recorded using visual analog scales. RESULTS: Following standardized olfactory testing, 78 of the 152 patients were categorized as functionally anosmic, 64 as hyposmic, and 10 as normosmic. Groups differed significantly with regard to ratings of olfactory function. Functionally anosmic patients rated impairment to be significantly higher compared with hyposmic and normosmic patients. Ratings of olfactory function correlated significantly with measured olfactory function (r = +0.57) and ratings of impairment (r = -0.30). CONCLUSION: There was a moderate correlation between ratings and measures of olfactory function. On average, functionally anosmic patients recognized their olfactory loss, although, on an individual basis, there were striking differences between measures and ratings of olfactory function.
Authors: Anna Oleszkiewicz; Maria Taut; Agnieszka Sorokowska; Ahmed Radwan; Reda Kamel; Thomas Hummel Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Susanne Rabady; Johann Altenberger; Markus Brose; Doris-Maria Denk-Linnert; Elisabeth Fertl; Florian Götzinger; Maria de la Cruz Gomez Pellin; Benedikt Hofbaur; Kathryn Hoffmann; Renate Hoffmann-Dorninger; Rembert Koczulla; Oliver Lammel; Bernd Lamprecht; Judith Löffler-Ragg; Christian A Müller; Stefanie Poggenburg; Hans Rittmannsberger; Paul Sator; Volker Strenger; Karin Vonbank; Johannes Wancata; Thomas Weber; Jörg Weber; Günter Weiss; Maria Wendler; Ralf-Harun Zwick Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Divya P Prajapati; Bita Shahrvini; Mena Said; Shanmukha Srinivas; Adam S DeConde; Carol H Yan Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 5.426
Authors: Katie E Webster; Lisa O'Byrne; Samuel MacKeith; Carl Philpott; Claire Hopkins; Martin J Burton Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-07-22
Authors: Lisa O'Byrne; Katie E Webster; Samuel MacKeith; Carl Philpott; Claire Hopkins; Martin J Burton Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-07-22