Literature DB >> 16401917

Comparison of the clinical value of complexed PSA and total PSA in the discrimination between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer.

Michael Froehner1, Oliver W Hakenberg, Rainer Koch, Uta Schmidt, Axel Meye, Manfred P Wirth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical value of the measurement of complex and total PSA in the discrimination between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer.
METHODS: In serum samples collected from 166 men with histopathologically proven clinically localized prostate cancer and of 97 men with BPH, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), complexed PSA and the free to total PSA ratio were determined. The statistical analysis was done by the comparison of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: The areas under the ROC curves were 0.776 for total PSA, 0.799 for complexed PSA (total PSA vs. cPSA: p < 0.0001) and 0.812 for the free to total PSA ratio. With a cut-off of 3.0 ng/ml for complexed PSA, the sensitivity was 90%, the specificity 58%, the positive and the negative predictive values 79 and 78%, respectively. With a cut-off of 4.0 ng/ml for total PSA, the sensitivity was 87%, the specificity 59%, the positive and the negative predictive values were 78 and 72%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant advantage for complexed PSA compared to total PSA in the discrimination between BPH and prostate cancer. The difference was, however, small and its clinical relevance is questionable. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16401917     DOI: 10.1159/000089731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Authors:  G Magistro; C G Stief; C Gratzke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Development of simultaneous detection of total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and free PSA with rapid bead-based immunoassay.

Authors:  Chong Xie; Guomin Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  The value of prostate-specific antigen in Asia.

Authors:  Chaidir Arif Mochtar; R Siddhi Andika
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

Review 4.  New intraprostatic injectables and prostatic urethral lift for male LUTS.

Authors:  Giuseppe Magistro; Christian G Stief; Christian Gratzke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  The Value of Prostate-Specific Antigen-Related Indexes and Imaging Screening in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaojing Bai; Yumei Jiang; Xinwei Zhang; Meiyu Wang; Juanhua Tian; Lijun Mu; Yuefeng Du
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 6.  Biomarkers for benign prostatic hyperplasia progression.

Authors:  Grant W Cannon; Robert H Getzenberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  A new algorithm in patients with elevated and/or rising prostate-specific antigen level, minor lower urinary tract symptoms, and negative multisite prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Koenraad van Renterghem; Gommert Van Koeveringe; Ruth Achten; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.370

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.