Literature DB >> 16401816

Etiologic diagnosis of chronic osteomyelitis: a prospective study.

Andres F Zuluaga1, Wilson Galvis, Juan G Saldarriaga, Maria Agudelo, Beatriz E Salazar, Omar Vesga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although bone specimens were established 25 years ago as the gold standard for etiologic diagnosis of chronic osteomyelitis, recent studies suggest that nonbone specimens are as accurate as bone to identify the causative agent. We examined concordance rates between cultures from nonbone and bone specimens in 100 patients.
METHODS: Prospective study conducted at Hospital Universitario San Vicente de Paul, a 750-bed university-based hospital located in Medellín, Colombia. We included patients with chronic osteomyelitis who had been free of antibiotic therapy for at least 48 hours, excluding those with diabetic foot and decubitus ulcers. At least 1 nonbone and 1 bone specimen were taken from each individual and subjected to complete microbiologic analysis.
RESULTS: Bone cultures allowed agent identification in 94% of cases, including anaerobic bacteria in 14%. Cultures of nonbone and bone specimens gave identical results in 30% of patients, with slightly better concordance in chronic osteomyelitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus (42%) than by all other bacterial species (22%). However, statistical concordance determined by the Cohen kappa statistic was less than 0 (-0.0092+/-0.0324), indicating that the observed concordance was no better than that expected by chance alone (P>.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate diagnosis and therapy of chronic osteomyelitis require microbiologic cultures of the infected bone. Nonbone specimens are not valid for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16401816     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.1.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  28 in total

Review 1.  Current diagnostic tools for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Julianna Kurlenda; Mariusz Grinholc
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Osteomyelitis management: More art than science?

Authors:  Bl Johnston; Jm Conly
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  Optimal culture incubation time in orthopedic device-associated infections: a retrospective analysis of prolonged 14-day incubation.

Authors:  Nora Schwotzer; Peter Wahl; Dominique Fracheboud; Emanuel Gautier; Christian Chuard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Distinguishing bone and soft tissue infections mimicking sarcomas requires multimodal multidisciplinary team assessment.

Authors:  J R Lex; J Gregory; C Allen; J P Reid; J D Stevenson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Six weeks antibiotic therapy for all bone infections: results of a cohort study.

Authors:  R Farhad; P-M Roger; C Albert; C Pélligri; C Touati; P Dellamonica; C Trojani; P Boileau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  A superficial swab culture is useful for microbiologic diagnosis in acute prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Jordi Cuñé; Alex Soriano; Juan C Martínez; Sebastián García; Josep Mensa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Increased risk of dementia among chronic osteomyelitis patients.

Authors:  C-H Tseng; W-S Huang; C-H Muo; C-H Kao
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  Bone and joint infections due to anaerobic bacteria: an analysis of 61 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  G Walter; M Vernier; P O Pinelli; M Million; M Coulange; P Seng; A Stein
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  [Diabetic foot syndrome from the perspective of angiology and diabetology].

Authors:  H Lawall; C Diehm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 10.  [Diabetic foot syndrome].

Authors:  H Lawall; H Reike
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.