OBJECTIVE: To investigate the physiologic differences during multispeed treadmill walking and physical activity profiles for the Otto Bock C-Walk foot (C-Walk), Flex-Foot, and solid ankle cushion heel (SACH) foot in people with transtibial amputation. DESIGN: A repeated-measures design with 3 prostheses. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eight men with unilateral transtibial amputation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physiologic responses (energy expenditure, gait efficiency, exercise intensity, rating of perceived exertion [RPE]) during multispeed treadmill walking (53.64, 67.05, 80.46, 93.87, 107.28 m/min) test were analyzed with 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). One-way ANOVA was employed to analyze foot-type differences for self-selected walking velocity (SSWV), and steps per day (daily activity). Analysis of covariance was used to analyze foot-type differences with SSWV as the covariable for the physiologic measurements. RESULTS: The C-Walk had a trend of improved physiologic responses compared with the SACH; however, no foot-type differences were statistically significant. Compared with the C-Walk and SACH, the Flex-Foot showed no significant differences in energy expenditure and gait efficiency, but significantly lower percentage of age-predicted maximum heart rate and RPE values. CONCLUSIONS: The energy storing-releasing feet appeared to have certain trends of improved gait performance compared with the SACH; however, not many objective foot-type differences were significantly noted. Further studies with a larger sample size are suggested.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the physiologic differences during multispeed treadmill walking and physical activity profiles for the Otto Bock C-Walk foot (C-Walk), Flex-Foot, and solid ankle cushion heel (SACH) foot in people with transtibial amputation. DESIGN: A repeated-measures design with 3 prostheses. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eight men with unilateral transtibial amputation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physiologic responses (energy expenditure, gait efficiency, exercise intensity, rating of perceived exertion [RPE]) during multispeed treadmill walking (53.64, 67.05, 80.46, 93.87, 107.28 m/min) test were analyzed with 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). One-way ANOVA was employed to analyze foot-type differences for self-selected walking velocity (SSWV), and steps per day (daily activity). Analysis of covariance was used to analyze foot-type differences with SSWV as the covariable for the physiologic measurements. RESULTS: The C-Walk had a trend of improved physiologic responses compared with the SACH; however, no foot-type differences were statistically significant. Compared with the C-Walk and SACH, the Flex-Foot showed no significant differences in energy expenditure and gait efficiency, but significantly lower percentage of age-predicted maximum heart rate and RPE values. CONCLUSIONS: The energy storing-releasing feet appeared to have certain trends of improved gait performance compared with the SACH; however, not many objective foot-type differences were significantly noted. Further studies with a larger sample size are suggested.
Authors: Ava D Segal; Karl E Zelik; Glenn K Klute; David C Morgenroth; Michael E Hahn; Michael S Orendurff; Peter G Adamczyk; Steven H Collins; Arthur D Kuo; Joseph M Czerniecki Journal: Hum Mov Sci Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 2.161
Authors: Joan E Sanders; Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; John C Cagle; Jake B McLean; Christian B Redd; Colin R Dietrich; Marcia A Ciol; Katheryn J Allyn Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 2.242