Literature DB >> 16400763

[Liver trauma: experience in the management of 252 cases].

Fabio Colombo1, Fabio Sansonna, Fabio Baticci, Rocco Corso, Ildo Scandroglio, Dario Maggioni, Stefano Di Lernia, Giovanni Carlo Ferrari, Carmelo Magistro, Andrea Costanzi, Raffaele Pugliese.   

Abstract

The treatment of liver traumas has evolved considerably over recent decades with the possibility of non-operative management and arteriographic embolisation for selected patients in haemodynamically stable conditions. The aim of the study was to compare two periods with different approaches to the management of blunt or penetrating liver injuries. From January 1989 to October 2004, 252 patients were admitted to the emergency surgery department of Niguarda Hospital in Milan for liver traumas. Hepatic lesions accounted for 66% of abdominal lesions due to trauma and were classified according to the Organ Injury Scaling system. Abdominal ultrasound and CT scans were used to investigate the injuries. The study consisted of two periods: during the first period (1989-1993) surgery was the only treatment for trauma-induced hepatic lesions of any grade. Damage control surgery was employed for unstable patients undergoing laparotomy. From 1994 on, grade 1-2 injuries in patients with haemodynamically stable conditions were treated by non-operative management and grade 3 injuries by embolisation. In this second period only unstable patients with active bleeding or haemoperitoneum >500 ml with grade 3-5 injuries underwent laparotomy. The overall mortality for liver traumas was 27% (68/252) and was intraoperative in 97% of cases (66/68). Deaths were due to liver haemorrhage in 30 cases and to bleeding from extrahepatic or extra-abdominal injuries in the other 38 cases. Liver trauma was therefore directly responsible for mortality in as many as 12% of cases (30/252). The present study analysed two periods characterised by different approaches to the management of liver trauma. In the first period, laparotomy was the only choice, whereas subsequently non-operative management came to play an important role in haemodynamically stable patients and proved to be a safe method in selected cases. Major liver resections are seldom indicated in liver injuries. Damage control surgery has been practised since the first period and, before any surgical manoeuvres are performed, still represents a valuable tool to guarantee haemodynamic stability, which is the crucial factor for the outcome of liver resections for trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16400763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chir Ital        ISSN: 0009-4773


  3 in total

1.  Perihepatic Packing versus Primary Surgical Repair in Patients with Blunt Liver Trauma; an 8-year Experience.

Authors:  Shahram Paydar; Mojtaba Mahmoodi; Mohammad Jamshidi; Hadi Niakan; Mohammad Keshavarz; Nader Moeenvaziri; Mohammad Esmaeil Ghorbaninejad; Farnaz Farrokhnia; Forough Izadi Fard; Zahra Jaafari; Yalda Golshan; Hamidreza Abbasi; Shahram Bolandparvaz; Behnam Honarvar
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2014-07

Review 2.  Damage control surgery for abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Alessandro Montedori; Eriberto Farinella; Isabella Bonacini; Ludovica Tagliabue; Iosief Abraha
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

Review 3.  Inflammatory response to the ischaemia-reperfusion insult in the liver after major tissue trauma.

Authors:  Yang Li; Annette Palmer; Ludmila Lupu; Markus Huber-Lang
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.374

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.