Literature DB >> 16400135

Research funding: peer review at NIH.

Toni Scarpa1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16400135     DOI： 10.1126/science.1122796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Administrative Discretion in Scientific Funding: Evidence from a Prestigious Postdoctoral Training Program.

Authors:  Donna K Ginther; Misty L Heggeness
Journal:  Res Policy       Date:  2020-03-14

2.  Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Erik Cobo; Albert Selva-O'Callagham; Josep-Maria Ribera; Francesc Cardellach; Ruth Dominguez; Miquel Vilardell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

Authors:  Susan Guthrie; Ioana Ghiga; Steven Wooding
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-08-07

4.  Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards.

Authors:  Donna K Ginther; Jodi Basner; Unni Jensen; Joshua Schnell; Raynard Kington; Walter T Schaffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.