Literature DB >> 16400078

Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm.

Kazim R Chohan1, Jeanine T Griffin, Marie Lafromboise, Christopher J De Jonge, Douglas T Carrell.   

Abstract

Sperm chromatin integrity is vital for successful pregnancy and transmission of genetic material to the offspring. We evaluated chromatin integrity in sperm from 60 infertile men and 7 fertile donors comparing the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), TdT-mediated-dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test, and acridine orange staining technique (AOT). The TUNEL and SCD assays showed a strong relationship with the SCSA (r > .866; P < .001) for sperm DNA fragmentation, both in infertile men and donors of known fertility. AOT did not show any relationship with SCSA. The breakdown of the DNA fragmentation index (DFI) into 3 categories (< or =15%, >15%-<30%, and > or =30%) showed that the SCSA, TUNEL, and SCD test predict the same levels of DNA fragmentation. AOT consistently showed higher levels of DNA fragmentation for each DFI category. DNA fragmentation in sperm between infertile men and donor sperm was significantly different (P < .05) under SCSA (22.0 +/- 1.6 vs 11.8 +/- 1.4), TUNEL (19.5 +/- 1.3 vs 11.1 +/- 0.9) and SCD (20.4 +/- 1.3 vs 10.8 +/- 1.1), respectively. DNA fragmentation in sperm evaluated by AOT did not differ (P > .05) between infertile men (31.3 +/- 2.4) and donors (32.7 +/- 4.8). AOT showed extreme variations for sperm DNA fragmentation in semen from both infertile men and donors. The problems of indistinct colors, rapid fading, and the heterogeneous staining were also faced. In conclusion, SCSA, TUNEL, and SCD show similar predictive values for DNA fragmentation, and AOT shows variable and increased levels of DNA fragmentation, which makes it of questionable value in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16400078     DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.05068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  58 in total

1.  Comparison of four methods to evaluate sperm DNA integrity between mouse caput and cauda epididymidis.

Authors:  Serafín Pérez-Cerezales; Alberto Miranda; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Protocol for the quantitative assessment of DNA concentration and damage (fragmentation and nicks).

Authors:  Christos D Georgiou; Ioannis Papapostolou; Konstantinos Grintzalis
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Fluctuation of "sperm DNA integrity" in accordance with semen parameters, and it's relationship with infertility.

Authors:  Ayşen Durmaz; Nurten Dikmen; Cumhur Gündüz; Ege Nazan Tavmergen Göker; Erol Tavmergen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  DNA fragmentation in concert with the simultaneous assessment of cell viability in a subfertile population: establishing thresholds of normality both before and after density gradient centrifugation.

Authors:  U Punjabi; H Van Mulders; I Goovaerts; K Peeters; E Roelant; D De Neubourg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Sperm chromosomal aneuploidy and DNA integrity of infertile men with anejaculation.

Authors:  Yi Qiu; Lei-Guang Wang; Li-Hong Zhang; Juan Li; Ai-Dong Zhang; Mei-Hua Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Optimization of microelectrophoresis to select highly negatively charged sperm.

Authors:  Luke Simon; Kristin Murphy; Kenneth I Aston; Benjamin R Emery; James M Hotaling; Douglas T Carrell
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Case report: the use of annexin V coupled with magnetic activated cell sorting in cryopreserved spermatozoa from a male cancer survivor: healthy twin newborns after two previous ICSI failures.

Authors:  María Belén Herrero; Géraldine Delbes; Jin-Tae Chung; Weon-Young Son; Hananel Holzer; William Buckett; Peter Chan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Double-stranded DNA breaks hidden in the neutral Comet assay suggest a role of the sperm nuclear matrix in DNA integrity maintenance.

Authors:  J Ribas-Maynou; J E Gawecka; J Benet; W S Ward
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Mechanical processing of hyperviscous semen specimens can negatively affect sperm DNA fragmentation.

Authors:  Ana Paula S Kussler; Anita M Pimentel; Diego D Alcoba; Isabella P Liu; Ilma Simoni Brum; Edison Capp; Helena V E Corleta
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan T Schulte; Dana A Ohl; Mark Sigman; Gary D Smith
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.