BACKGROUND: In many sports, female athletes have a higher incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury than do male athletes. Among many risk factors, the lower rotatory joint stiffness of female knees has been suggested for the increased rate of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. HYPOTHESIS: In response to combined rotatory loads, female knees have significantly lower torsional joint stiffness and higher rotatory joint laxity than do male knees at low flexion angles, despite the fact that no such gender differences would be found in response to an anterior tibial load. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative laboratory study. METHODS: Joint kinematics of 82 human cadaveric knees (38 female, 44 male) in response to (1) combined rotatory loads of 10 N x m valgus and +/- 5 N x m internal tibial torques and (2) a 134-N anterior-posterior tibial load were measured using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. RESULTS: In response to combined rotatory loads, female knees had as much as 25% lower torsional joint stiffness (female: 0.79 N x m/deg; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.91; male: 1.06 N x m/deg; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.17) and up to 35% higher rotatory joint laxity (female: 26.2 degrees; 95% confidence interval, 24.5 degrees-27.9 degrees; male: 20.5 degrees; 95% confidence interval, 18.8 degrees-22.2 degrees) than did male knees (P < .05), whereas there were no gender differences in response to the anterior tibial load (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Female knees had lower torsional joint stiffness and higher rotatory joint laxity than did male knees in response to combined rotatory loads. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Larger axial rotations of female knees in response to rotatory loads may affect the distribution of forces in soft tissues and the function of muscles that provide knee stability. Control algorithms used during the biomechanical testing of cadaveric knees and computational knee models might need to be gender specific.
BACKGROUND: In many sports, female athletes have a higher incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury than do male athletes. Among many risk factors, the lower rotatory joint stiffness of female knees has been suggested for the increased rate of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. HYPOTHESIS: In response to combined rotatory loads, female knees have significantly lower torsional joint stiffness and higher rotatory joint laxity than do male knees at low flexion angles, despite the fact that no such gender differences would be found in response to an anterior tibial load. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative laboratory study. METHODS: Joint kinematics of 82 human cadaveric knees (38 female, 44 male) in response to (1) combined rotatory loads of 10 N x m valgus and +/- 5 N x m internal tibial torques and (2) a 134-N anterior-posterior tibial load were measured using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. RESULTS: In response to combined rotatory loads, female knees had as much as 25% lower torsional joint stiffness (female: 0.79 N x m/deg; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.91; male: 1.06 N x m/deg; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.17) and up to 35% higher rotatory joint laxity (female: 26.2 degrees; 95% confidence interval, 24.5 degrees-27.9 degrees; male: 20.5 degrees; 95% confidence interval, 18.8 degrees-22.2 degrees) than did male knees (P < .05), whereas there were no gender differences in response to the anterior tibial load (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Female knees had lower torsional joint stiffness and higher rotatory joint laxity than did male knees in response to combined rotatory loads. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Larger axial rotations of female knees in response to rotatory loads may affect the distribution of forces in soft tissues and the function of muscles that provide knee stability. Control algorithms used during the biomechanical testing of cadaveric knees and computational knee models might need to be gender specific.
Authors: Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Ajit M Chaudhari; Darin A Padua; Scott G McLean; Susan M Sigward Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Natasha Anoka; John Nyland; Mark McGinnis; Dave Lee; Mahmut Nedim Doral; David N M Caborn Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Yona Kosashvili; Ian P Mayne; Tom Trajkovski; Dror Lackstein; Oleg Safir; David Backstein Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Abbas Kothari; Bryan Haughom; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Brian Feeley; Xiaojuan Li; C Benjamin Ma Journal: Knee Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 2.199