Literature DB >> 16399860

Aortic reflection coefficients and their association with global indexes of wave reflection in healthy controls and patients with Marfan's syndrome.

P Segers1, J De Backer, D Devos, S I Rabben, T C Gillebert, L M Van Bortel, J De Sutter, A De Paepe, P R Verdonck.   

Abstract

Early return of reflected pressure waves increases the load on central arteries and may increase the risk of aortic rupture in patients with Marfan's syndrome (MFS). To assess whether wave reflection is elevated in MFS, we used ultrasound and MRI to measure central pressure and flow waveforms in 26 patients (13-54 yr of age) and 26 age- and gender-matched controls. Aortic systolic and diastolic cross-sectional areas were measured at the ascending and descending aorta (AA and DA), diaphragm (DIA), and lower abdominal aorta (AB). From these measurements, local characteristic impedance (Z(0-xx)) and local reflection coefficients (Gamma(xx-yy)) were calculated. Calculated global wave reflection indexes were the augmentation index (AIx) and the ratio of backward to forward pressure wave (P(b)/P(f)). The aorta was wider in MFS patients at AA (P < 0.01) and DA (P < 0.01). Aortic pulse wave velocity was 42 cm/s higher in MFS patients (P < 0.05). Z(0-xx) was not different between groups, except at DA, where it was lower in MFS patients. In controls, Gamma(AA-DA) was 0.31 +/- 0.08, Gamma(DA-DIA) was 0.00 +/- 0.11, and Gamma(DIA-AB) was 0.31 +/- 0.16. Mean values of Gamma(xx-yy) were not different between MFS patients and controls. In controls, aging diminished Gamma(AA-DA) but increased Gamma(DIA-AB). Clear age-related patterns were absent in MFS patients. AIx or P(b)/P(f) was not higher in MFS patients than in controls. There were indications for enhanced wave reflection in young MFS patients. Our data demonstrated that the major determinants of AIx were pulse wave velocity and the effective length of the arterial system and, to a lesser degree, HR and P(b)/P(f).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16399860     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01207.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  11 in total

1.  The role of wall shear stress in the assessment of right ventricle hydraulic workload.

Authors:  Vitaly Kheyfets; Mirunalini Thirugnanasambandam; Lourdes Rios; Daniel Evans; Triston Smith; Theodore Schroeder; Jeffrey Mueller; Srinivas Murali; David Lasorda; Jennifer Spotti; Ender Finol
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.017

2.  Recommendations for Improving and Standardizing Vascular Research on Arterial Stiffness: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Raymond R Townsend; Ian B Wilkinson; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Alberto P Avolio; Julio A Chirinos; John R Cockcroft; Kevin S Heffernan; Edward G Lakatta; Carmel M McEniery; Gary F Mitchell; Samer S Najjar; Wilmer W Nichols; Elaine M Urbina; Thomas Weber
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  A review of wave mechanics in the pulmonary artery with an emphasis on wave intensity analysis.

Authors:  J Su; O Hilberg; L Howard; U Simonsen; A D Hughes
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 6.311

4.  Pulmonary vascular wall stiffness: An important contributor to the increased right ventricular afterload with pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Zhijie Wang; Naomi C Chesler
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.017

5.  Augmentation index assessed by applanation tonometry is elevated in Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Rupert A Payne; Roland C Hilling-Smith; David J Webb; Simon R Maxwell; Martin A Denvir
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Inadequacy of Augmentation Index for Monitoring Arterial Stiffness: Comparison with Arterial Compliance and Other Hemodynamic Variables.

Authors:  Mehmet Kaya; Vignesh Balasubramanian; John K-J Li
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.305

7.  Assessment of Model Based (Input) Impedance, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Wave Reflection in the Asklepios Cohort.

Authors:  Bernhard Hametner; Stephanie Parragh; Christopher Mayer; Thomas Weber; Luc Van Bortel; Marc De Buyzere; Patrick Segers; Ernst Rietzschel; Siegfried Wassertheurer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ambulatory (24 h) blood pressure and arterial stiffness measurement in Marfan syndrome patients: a case control feasibility and pilot study.

Authors:  Matthias Hillebrand; Ghazaleh Nouri; Bernhard Hametner; Stephanie Parragh; Jelena Köster; Kai Mortensen; Achim Schwarz; Yskert von Kodolitsch; Siegfried Wassertheurer
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  The Beneficial Effect of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade in Marfan Syndrome Patients after Aortic Root Replacement.

Authors:  Seung Jun Lee; Jaewon Oh; Young Guk Ko; Sak Lee; Byung Chul Chang; Do Yun Lee; Young Ran Kwak; Donghoon Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Impaired Central Pulsatile Hemodynamics in Children and Adolescents With Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Andrea Grillo; Paolo Salvi; Susan Marelli; Lan Gao; Lucia Salvi; Andrea Faini; Giuliana Trifirò; Renzo Carretta; Alessandro Pini; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.