Literature DB >> 1639977

Do women want a once-a-month pill?

C Rimmer1, M Horga, V Cerar, E M Alder, D T Baird, A Glasier.   

Abstract

The attitudes of women of reproductive age in Scotland, Romania and Slovenia to the idea of a contraceptive pill which is taken only once each month or only when menses are delayed was investigated. In all three centres, the great majority of women felt positive towards the idea of a once-a-month pill which inhibited ovulation and greater than 50% found a pill which inhibited or interfered with implantation an acceptable idea. Only 24% of women in Scotland were attracted to the idea of a pill which was taken only if menstruation was delayed by 1 or 2 days, that is a pill which would cause an abortion, while in contrast 58% of women in Slovenia and 80% in Romania thought that such a method of controlling fertility would be acceptable. Attitudes were not related to age, social class or marital status but were influenced by religious belief and in Scotland by a history of abortion. In countries where the availability of contraception is limited and abortion is common, women would seem to welcome another method of fertility regulation--even one which disrupts the very early stages of pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortifacient Agents; Abortion Rate; Abortion, Drug Induced; Abortion, Induced; Attitude--women; Behavior; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Mode Of Action; Contraceptive Usage; Cross-cultural Comparisons; Developed Countries; Eastern Europe; Europe; Family Planning; Family Planning Surveys; Fertility Control, Postconception; Implantation Suppression; Inhibition Of Fertilization; Method Acceptability; Northern Europe; Oral Contraceptives; Ovulation Suppression; Psychological Factors; Religion; Research Methodology; Romania; Scotland; Southern Europe; Studies; United Kingdom; Yugoslavia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1639977     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  4 in total

Review 1.  Science, medicine, and the future. Contraception.

Authors:  D T Baird; A F Glasier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-09

2.  The science, medicine, and future of contraception.

Authors:  D T Baird; A F Glasier
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-05

Review 3.  Emergency contraception. Widely available and effective but disappointing as a public health intervention: a review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Embracing post-fertilisation methods of family planning: a call to action.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Raymond; Francine Coeytaux; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Kirsten Moore; James Trussell; Beverly Winikoff
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2013-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.