Literature DB >> 16399769

Lifetime effects, costs, and cost effectiveness of testing for human papillomavirus to manage low grade cytological abnormalities: results of the NHS pilot studies.

Rosa Legood1, Alastair Gray, Jane Wolstenholme, Sue Moss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To predict the incremental lifetime effects, costs, and cost effectiveness of using human papillomavirus testing to triage women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear results for immediate colposcopy.
DESIGN: Modelling study.
SETTING: Three centres participating in NHS pilot studies, United Kingdom. Population Women aged 25-64 with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear results.
INTERVENTIONS: Screening using conventional cytology, liquid based cytology, and four strategies with different age cut-off points and follow up times that used combined liquid based cytology and human papillomavirus testing (adjunctive human papillomavirus testing).
RESULTS: The model predicts that compared with using conventional cytology without testing for human papillomavirus, testing for the virus in conjunction with liquid based cytology for women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear results (aged 35 or more) would cost 3735 pounds sterling (5528 euros; 6474 dollars) per life year saved. Extending adjunctive human papillomavirus testing in combination with liquid based cytology to include women aged between 25 and 34 costs an additional 4233 pounds sterling per life year saved. Human papillomavirus testing is likely to reduce lifetime repeat smears by 52%-86% but increase lifetime colposcopies by 64%-138%.
CONCLUSIONS: Testing for human papillomavirus to manage all women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear results is likely to be cost effective. The predicted increase in lifetime colposcopies, however, deserves careful consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16399769      PMCID: PMC1326928          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38698.458866.7C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  16 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Nanda; D C McCrory; E R Myers; L A Bastian; V Hasselblad; J D Hickey; D B Matchar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-16       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.

Authors:  N Payne; J Chilcott; E McGoogan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

Authors:  E Fenwick; K Claxton; M Sculpher
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Andrew H Briggs; Ron Goeree; Gord Blackhouse; Bernie J O'Brien
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Alternative decision modelling techniques for the evaluation of health care technologies: Markov processes versus discrete event simulation.

Authors:  Jonathan Karnon
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide.

Authors:  J M Walboomers; M V Jacobs; M M Manos; F X Bosch; J A Kummer; K V Shah; P J Snijders; J Peto; C J Meijer; N Muñoz
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  Mathematical model for the natural history of human papillomavirus infection and cervical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  E R Myers; D C McCrory; K Nanda; L Bastian; D B Matchar
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Thomas C Wright; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; J Thomas Cox; L Stewart Massad; Leo B Twiggs; Edward J Wilkinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study.

Authors:  J Cuzick; A Szarewski; H Cubie; G Hulman; H Kitchener; D Luesley; E McGoogan; U Menon; G Terry; R Edwards; C Brooks; M Desai; C Gie; L Ho; I Jacobs; C Pickles; P Sasieni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

1.  When to test women for human papillomavirus.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-14

2.  When to test women for human papillomavirus: take this opportunity to screen for anal cancer too.

Authors:  Awori J Hayanga
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-28

3.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.

Authors:  J van Rosmalen; I M C M de Kok; M van Ballegooijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  HPV testing as a triage for borderline or mild dyskaryosis on cervical cytology: results from the Sentinel Sites study.

Authors:  R S Kelly; J Patnick; H C Kitchener; S M Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Options for managing low grade cervical abnormalities detected at screening: cost effectiveness study.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

6.  Cost and logistics of alternative roll-out options for implementing human papillomavirus testing as a triage in cervical screening: results of the sentinel sites study.

Authors:  R Legood; Z Sadique; J Patnick; H Kitchener; R Kelly; S Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Triage of women with equivocal or low-grade cervical cytology results: a meta-analysis of the HPV test positivity rate.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; Frank Buntinx; Marc Van Ranst; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 5.310

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.