RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to determine whether intravascular time-density course and visualization of the coronary arteries differ with use of a hyperosmolar monomeric versus an iso-osmolar dimeric contrast agent in electron beam tomography (EBT) of the heart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients underwent EBT of the coronary arteries using the monomeric ioversol or the dimeric iodixanol at the same concentration of 320 mg I/mL. Contrast volume was determined relative to body surface area and injected over 40 seconds. Intravascular time-density curves were created for quantitative analysis. For qualitative assessment, visualization of coronary arteries on axial scans and three-dimensional reconstructions was scored. Patients were matched for contrast flow, transit time, and mean pulse rate for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Ioversol produced a significantly greater increase in intravascular density for up to 30 seconds after injection (P < .01) compared with iodixanol. No difference between the two contrast media was seen in the qualitative assessment. CONCLUSION: Monomeric and dimeric contrast media differ in their time-density curves at coronary EBT, a reason for which is not apparent. Qualitative evaluation of coronary arteries is not affected by this difference.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to determine whether intravascular time-density course and visualization of the coronary arteries differ with use of a hyperosmolar monomeric versus an iso-osmolar dimeric contrast agent in electron beam tomography (EBT) of the heart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients underwent EBT of the coronary arteries using the monomeric ioversol or the dimeric iodixanol at the same concentration of 320 mg I/mL. Contrast volume was determined relative to body surface area and injected over 40 seconds. Intravascular time-density curves were created for quantitative analysis. For qualitative assessment, visualization of coronary arteries on axial scans and three-dimensional reconstructions was scored. Patients were matched for contrast flow, transit time, and mean pulse rate for statistical analysis. RESULTS:Ioversol produced a significantly greater increase in intravascular density for up to 30 seconds after injection (P < .01) compared with iodixanol. No difference between the two contrast media was seen in the qualitative assessment. CONCLUSION: Monomeric and dimeric contrast media differ in their time-density curves at coronary EBT, a reason for which is not apparent. Qualitative evaluation of coronary arteries is not affected by this difference.