Literature DB >> 1639833

The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering.

D Gagnon1, M Gagnon.   

Abstract

Asymmetrical lifting and lowering are predominant activities in the workplace. Mechanical causes are suggested for many back injuries and the dynamic conditions within which spine loading occurs are related to spine loading increase. More data on tridimensional biomechanical lumbar spine loading during asymmetrical lifting and lowering are needed. A tridimensional dynamic multisegment model was developed to compute spinal loading for asymmetrical box-handling situations. The tridimensional positions of the anatomical markers were generated by a direct linear transformation algorithm adapted for the processing of data from two real and two virtual views (mirrors). Two force platforms measured the external forces. Five male subjects performed three variations (slow, fast and accelerated) of asymmetric lifting and two variations (slow and fast) of asymmetric lowering. The torsional, extension/flexion and lateral bending net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint were computed and peak values selected for statistical analysis. For the lifting task, the fast and accelerated conditions showed significant increases over the slow condition for torsion, extension/flexion and lateral-bending moments. The accelerated condition also showed significant increases over the fast condition for extension. A comparison between lifting and lowering tasks showed equivalent loadings for torsion and extension. The moments were compared to average maximal values measured on equivalent male subject populations by isokinetic dynamometry. This showed torsional and extension values of 30 and 83% of the maximal possible subject capacity, respectively. These results demonstrated that dynamic factors do influence the load on the spine and highlighted the influence of both lifting and lowering on the loading of the spine. This suggested that for a more complete analysis of asymmetrical handling, the maximal velocity and acceleration produced during lifting should be included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1639833     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90229-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  16 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of isokinetic lifting and free lifting when applied to chronic low back pain rehabilitation.

Authors:  S Bouilland; P Loslever; F X Lepoutre
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Mechanical demands on the lower back in patients with non-chronic low back pain during a symmetric lowering and lifting task.

Authors:  Iman Shojaei; Elizabeth G Salt; Quenten Hooker; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Jump-landing biomechanics and knee-laxity change across the menstrual cycle in women with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  David R Bell; J Troy Blackburn; Anthony C Hackney; Stephen W Marshall; Anthony I Beutler; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The leading joint hypothesis for spatial reaching arm motions.

Authors:  Satyajit Ambike; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Contribution of knee flexor and extensor strength on sex-specific energy absorption and torsional joint stiffness during drop jumping.

Authors:  Randy J Schmitz; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Sagittal-Plane Knee Moment During Gait and Knee Cartilage Thickness.

Authors:  Randy J Schmitz; David Harrison; Hsin-Min Wang; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Associations Among Eccentric Hamstrings Strength, Hamstrings Stiffness, and Jump-Landing Biomechanics.

Authors:  Derek R Dewig; Jonathan S Goodwin; Brian G Pietrosimone; J Troy Blackburn
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Joint laxity is related to lower extremity energetics during a drop jump landing.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Beverly J Levine
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Effects of transverse and frontal plane knee laxity on hip and knee neuromechanics during drop landings.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Hamstrings stiffness and landing biomechanics linked to anterior cruciate ligament loading.

Authors:  J Troy Blackburn; Marc F Norcross; Lindsey N Cannon; Steven M Zinder
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.