Literature DB >> 16397755

Treatment of female veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: the role of comfort in a predominantly male environment.

Alan Fontana1, Robert Rosenheck.   

Abstract

This study examines the role of women's comfort in coming for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in a predominantly male environment. Consecutive admissions (N = 224) to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)'s Women's Stress Disorder Treatment Teams were enrolled in an outcome study from July 1998 through June 2000. Women reported that they were somewhat comfortable in coming to the VA for their mental health care. For women who had no prior experience with the VA, comfort increased with their exposure to the treatment program. Further, for this group of women, comfort level was related significantly to their commitment to working in therapy and the regularity of their attendance in treatment over time. There were no significant changes in comfort level for women who had prior contact with the VA. Comfort level was unrelated to satisfaction and only minimally related to clinical outcomes. The primary role of women's comfort level, therefore, appeared to be as a facilitator of their participation in the therapeutic process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16397755     DOI: 10.1007/s11126-006-7961-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  10 in total

1.  The case management relationship and outcomes of homeless persons with serious mental illness.

Authors:  M J Chinman; R Rosenheck; J A Lam
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome.

Authors:  C C Attkisson; R Zwick
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  1982

3.  Therapeutic alliance and outcome in a VA intensive case management program.

Authors:  M S Neale; R A Rosenheck
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  A short form of the Mississippi Scale for measuring change in combat-related PTSD.

Authors:  A Fontana; R Rosenheck
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  1994-07

5.  New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers.

Authors:  A T McLellan; L Luborsky; J Cacciola; J Griffith; F Evans; H L Barr; C P O'Brien
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.254

6.  Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales.

Authors:  K A Wallston; B S Wallston; R DeVellis
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1978

7.  Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function.

Authors:  G Smilkstein; C Ashworth; D Montano
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Utilization of mental health services by women in a male-dominated environment: the VA experience.

Authors:  R A Hoff; R A Rosenheck
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Construction and validation of a questionnaire to measure the health beliefs of general practice patients.

Authors:  J Cockburn; P Fahey; R W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Female veterans' use of Department of Veterans Affairs health care services.

Authors:  R A Hoff; R A Rosenheck
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.983

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes of homeless female and male veterans in transitional housing.

Authors:  Jack Tsai; Robert A Rosenheck; James F McGuire
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2012-12

2.  Women veterans' experience with a web-based diabetes prevention program: a qualitative study to inform future practice.

Authors:  Tannaz Moin; Kristyn Ertl; Jessica Schneider; Elena Vasti; Fatima Makki; Caroline Richardson; Kathryn Havens; Laura Damschroder
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.