Literature DB >> 16397195

Comparison of complications of percutaneous endoscopic versus surgically placed gastrostomy tubes in 42 dogs and 52 cats.

Brenda Jo Salinardi1, Kenneth R Harkin, Barret J Bulmer, James K Roush.   

Abstract

Dogs and cats that had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube or surgically placed gastrostomy (SPG) tube inserted were retrospectively analyzed to compare complication rates and the severity of complications. Complication rates and severity scores were not significantly different when the PEG tube group was compared to the SPG tube group in either dogs or cats. Only when data from dogs and cats were combined did PEG tubes have a significantly higher complication rate and significantly greater complication severity scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16397195     DOI: 10.5326/0420051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc        ISSN: 0587-2871            Impact factor:   1.023


  3 in total

1.  Repurposing medical devices as "button" esophagostomy tubes for extended nutritional support.

Authors:  Melanie D Craven
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Esophagojejunostomy feeding tube placement in 5 dogs with pancreatitis and anorexia.

Authors:  Forrest Cummings; Catherine A Daley
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2014-03-06

3.  Complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Dogs and Cats Receiving Corticosteroid Treatment.

Authors:  J Aguiar; Y M Chang; O A Garden
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.333

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.