Literature DB >> 16396861

Predicting the risk for sudden infant death syndrome from obstetric characteristics: a retrospective cohort study of 505,011 live births.

Gordon C S Smith1, Ian R White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a simple robust method for assessing the risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) on the basis of obstetric characteristics.
METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted of data from the linked Scottish Morbidity Record, Stillbirth and Infant Death Enquiry and General Registrar's Office database of births and deaths, encompassing births in Scotland between 1992 and 2001. All women who had a singleton live birth between 24 and 43 weeks' gestation and for whom data were available (n = 505,011), divided into model development and validation samples, were studied. The main outcome measure was death of the infant in the first year of life as a result of SIDS.
RESULTS: The risk for SIDS was modeled in the development sample using logistic regression with the following predictors: maternal age, parity, marital status, smoking, and the birth weight and the gender of the infant. When the model was evaluated in the validation sample, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.84 and the incidence of SIDS was 0.7 per 10,000 (95% confidence interval: 0.3-1.4) among 126,253 women in the lower 50% of predicted risk and 29.7 per 10,000 (95% confidence interval: 23.4-37.2) among the 25,250 women in the top 10% of predicted risk. A logistic-regression model then was developed for the whole population, and the output was converted into adjusted likelihood ratios. These are tabulated and provide a simple method for assessing the risk for SIDS associated with any combination of obstetric characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: A model that uses maternal characteristics and outcome at birth is predictive of the risk for SIDS. This model is presented in a simple form that allows calculation of the individual risk for SIDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16396861     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-2828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  6 in total

1.  A proof-of-concept study to construct Bayesian network decision models for supporting the categorization of sudden unexpected infant death.

Authors:  Hideki Hamayasu; Masashi Miyao; Chihiro Kawai; Toshio Osamura; Akira Yamamoto; Hirozo Minami; Hitoshi Abiru; Keiji Tamaki; Hirokazu Kotani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Maternal and perinatal risk factors for SIDS: a novel analysis utilizing pregnancy outcome data.

Authors:  Amanda R Highet; Paul N Goldwater
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  A Type A and Type D Combined Personality Typology in Essential Hypertension and Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: Associations with Demographic, Psychological, Clinical, and Lifestyle Indicators.

Authors:  Patrizia Steca; Marco D'Addario; Maria Elena Magrin; Massimo Miglioretti; Dario Monzani; Luca Pancani; Marcello Sarini; Marta Scrignaro; Luca Vecchio; Francesco Fattirolli; Cristina Giannattasio; Francesca Cesana; Salvatore Pio Riccobono; Andrea Greco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Maturation of Arousals during Day and Night in Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Aurore Guyon; Francoise Ravet; Alex Champavert; Marine Thieux; Hugues Patural; Sabine Plancoulaine; Patricia Franco
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08

5.  Development and validation of the Safe Sleep Calculator to assess risk of sudden unexpected death in infancy.

Authors:  C G McIntosh; J M D Thompson; K Leech; R Carpenter; E A Mitchell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Birth weight differences between those offered financial voucher incentives for verified smoking cessation and control participants enrolled in the Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT), employing an intuitive approach and a Complier Average Causal Effects (CACE) analysis.

Authors:  Alex McConnachie; Caroline Haig; Lesley Sinclair; Linda Bauld; David M Tappin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.