Literature DB >> 1639655

The effect of systemic therapy on local-regional control in locally advanced breast cancer.

L J Pierce1, M Lippman, N Ben-Baruch, S Swain, J O'Shaughnessy, J L Bader, D Danforth, D Venzon, K H Cowan.   

Abstract

One hundred and seven patients with locally advanced breast cancer were prospectively referred for multimodality treatment on protocol using chemohormonal therapy to maximal response followed by local treatment and maintenance therapy. Forty-eight patients (45%) were diagnosed with Stage IIIA disease, 46 (43%) with Stage IIIB inflammatory cancer, and 13 (12%) with Stage IIIB non-inflammatory disease. Induction therapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil with hormonal synchronization using tamoxifen and conjugated estrogens. Local treatment was determined by response to chemotherapy. Patients with a clinical parital response underwent mastectomy followed by local-regional radiotherapy while patients with a clinical complete response were biopsied for pathologic correlation. Those with residual disease received mastectomy followed by radiotherapy while those with a pathologic complete response received radiation only to the intact breast and regional nodes. With a median follow-up of 64 months, patients with IIIA disease had a significantly lower local-regional failure rate compared to IIIB inflammatory patients, with the 5-year actuarial local-regional failure rate as only site of first failure 3% for IIIA disease versus 21% for IIIB inflammatory cancer (p = .02), and local-regional failure as any component of first failure 12% versus 36% (p = .01), respectively. When local-regional failure was analyzed by repeat biopsy, 5/31 (16%) patients with a pathologic complete response treated with radiation only developed a local-regional failure versus 2/53 (4%) with residual disease treated with mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy. The 5-year actuarial local-regional failure rate as first site of failure was 23% for radiation only versus 5% for mastectomy and post-operative radiotherapy (p = .07). The response to chemotherapy did not reliably predict local-regional control. Both relapse-free survival and overall survival were significantly better for IIIA versus IIIB patients; stratification by repeat biopsy did not however, significantly affect either relapse-free or overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1639655     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90899-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  Fungating Breast Cancer: Experience in Low and Middle Income Country.

Authors:  Raouef Ahmed Bichoo; Sanjay Kumar Yadav; Anjali Mishra; Punita Lal; Gyan Chand; Gaurav Agarwal; Amit Agarwal; Saroj K Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-02-19

2.  Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer: Focus on chemotherapy and biological targeted treatments' armamentarium.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papadimitriou; Konstantinos Papademetriou; Alexandros Ardavanis; Panteleimon Kountourakis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  The position and current status of radiation therapy after primary systemic therapy in breast cancer: a national survey-based expert consensus statement.

Authors:  M Arenas; Á Montero; M D de Las Peñas; M Algara
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on patients with locally advanced breast cancer in a Nigerian semiurban teaching hospital: a single-center descriptive study.

Authors:  Olukayode Adeolu Arowolo; Andrew Akinbolaji Akinkuolie; Oladejo Olukayode Lawal; Olusegun Isaac Alatise; Abdulkadir Ayo Salako; Adewale Oluseye Adisa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Locally advanced breast cancer in developing countries: the place of surgery.

Authors:  Justus P Apffelstaedt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Feasibility study of safe breast conservation in large and locally advanced cancers with use of radiopaque markers to mark pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumor margins.

Authors:  Vivek Aggarwal; Gaurav Agarwal; Punita Lal; Narendra Krishnani; Anjali Mishra; Ashok K Verma; Saroj K Mishra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 15. Treatment for women with stage III or locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Tamara Shenkier; Lorna Weir; Mark Levine; Ivo Olivotto; Timothy Whelan; Leonard Reyno
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Locally advanced breast cancer: comparison of mammography, sonography and MR imaging in evaluation of residual disease in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Viviana Londero; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Del Frate; Fabio Puglisi; Carla Di Loreto; Giuliana Francescutti; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Effect of pathologic stages on postmastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and total mastectomy: A Cancer Database Analysis.

Authors:  Jiaqiang Zhang; Chang-Yun Lu; Chien-Hsin Chen; Ho-Min Chen; Szu-Yuan Wu
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Prediction of outcome in locally advanced breast cancer by post-chemotherapy nodal status and baseline serum tumour markers.

Authors:  B Brenner; N Siris; E Rakowsky; E Fenig; A Sulkes; H Lurie
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.