Literature DB >> 16396175

Pleiotropic effects of beneficial mutations in Escherichia coli.

Elizabeth A Ostrowski1, Daniel E Rozen, Richard E Lenski.   

Abstract

Micromutational models of adaptation have placed considerable weight on antagonistic pleiotropy as a mechanism that prevents mutations of large effect from achieving fixation. However, there are few empirical studies of the distribution of pleiotropic effects, and no studies that have examined this distribution for a large number of adaptive mutations. Here we examine the form and extent of pleiotropy associated with beneficial mutations in Escherichia coli. To do so, we used a collection of independently evolved genotypes, each of which contains a beneficial mutation that confers increased fitness in a glucose-limited environment. To determine the pleiotropic effects of these mutations, we examined the fitnesses of the mutants in five novel resource environments. Our results show that the majority of mutations had significant fitness effects in alternative resources, such that pleiotropy was common. The predominant form of this pleiotropy was positive--that is, most mutations that conferred increased fitness in glucose also conferred increased fitness in novel resources. We did detect some deleterious pleiotropic effects, but they were primarily limited to one of the five resources, and within this resource, to only a subset of mutants. Although pleiotropic effects were generally positive, fitness levels were lower and more variable on resources that differed most in their mechanisms of uptake and catabolism from that of glucose. Positive pleiotropic effects were strongly correlated in magnitude with their direct effects, but no such correlation was found among mutants with deleterious pleiotropic effects. Whereas previous studies of populations evolved on glucose for longer periods of time showed consistent declines on some of the resources used here, our results suggest that deleterious pleiotropic effects were limited to only a subset of the beneficial mutations available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16396175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  43 in total

1.  Synergistic Pleiotropy Overrides the Costs of Complexity in Viral Adaptation.

Authors:  Lindsey W McGee; Andrew M Sackman; Anneliese J Morrison; Jessica Pierce; Jeremy Anisman; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  High frequency of mutations that expand the host range of an RNA virus.

Authors:  Martin T Ferris; Paul Joyce; Christina L Burch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The genetic basis of parallel and divergent phenotypic responses in evolving populations of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ostrowski; Robert J Woods; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Complex genetic changes in strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived by selection in the laboratory.

Authors:  Joshua T Witten; Christina T L Chen; Barak A Cohen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Increase in quantitative variation after exposure to environmental stresses and/or introduction of a major mutation: G x E interaction and epistasis or canalization?

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Surviving the bottleneck: transmission mutants and the evolution of microbial populations.

Authors:  Andreas Handel; Matthew R Bennett
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Adaptation of tobacco etch potyvirus to a susceptible ecotype of Arabidopsis thaliana capacitates it for systemic infection of resistant ecotypes.

Authors:  Jasna Lalić; Patricia Agudelo-Romero; Purificación Carrasco; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Impact of epistasis and pleiotropy on evolutionary adaptation.

Authors:  Bjørn Ostman; Arend Hintze; Christoph Adami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Cost of adaptation and fitness effects of beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  Thomas Bataillon; Tianyi Zhang; Rees Kassen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evaluating the within-host fitness effects of mutations fixed during virus adaptation to different ecotypes of a new host.

Authors:  Julia Hillung; José M Cuevas; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.