Literature DB >> 16396083

Disruption of latent inhibition by interpolation of task-irrelevant stimulation between preexposure and conditioning.

Martha Escobar1, Francisco Arcediano, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

Latent inhibition refers to attenuated responding to a conditioned stimulus (CS) that was repeatedly presented without reinforcement prior to the CS-unconditioned stimulus (US) pairings. Using water-deprived rats as subjects, we observed that interpolating task-irrelevant stimulation between the preexposure and conditioning phases of a latent inhibition procedure attenuated latent inhibition (Experiments 1A, 1B, and 2). Apparently, interpolated stimulation segments the preexposure and conditioning treatments into two separate experiences, much in the same way that a change of context would. Consistent with this view, the interpolated stimulation did not disrupt latent inhibition if it was also presented during both preexposure and conditioning (Experiment 3). We view these results as analogous to those of Escobar, Arcediano, and Miller (2003), who suggested that the difficulty in observing latent inhibition in human adults is related to the segmentation between preexposure and conditioning caused by the usual interpolation of instructions in preparations with humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16396083     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  15 in total

1.  Latent inhibition with a response time measure from a within-subject design: effects of number of preexposures, masking task, context change, and delay.

Authors:  L G De la Casa; R E Lubow
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Latent inhibition in human adults without masking.

Authors:  Martha Escobar; Francisco Arcediano; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Latent inhibition: the effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditional stimulus.

Authors:  R E LUBOW; A U MOORE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-08

4.  Are high-schizotypal normal participants distractible or limited in attentional resources? A study of latent inhibition as a function of masking task load and schizotypy level.

Authors:  H Braunstein-Bercovitz; R E Lubow
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1998-11

Review 5.  Latent inhibition.

Authors:  R E Lubow
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Disruption of a taste familiarity effect by novel exteroceptive stimulation.

Authors:  J W Rudy; L Rosenberg; J H Sandell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1977-01

7.  Latent inhibition, context specificity, and context familiarity.

Authors:  I P McLaren; C Bennett; K Plaisted; M Aitken; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1994-11

Review 8.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects.

Authors:  S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11

Review 10.  Latent inhibition in humans: data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia.

Authors:  R E Lubow; J C Gewirtz
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  2 in total

1.  Signaling a change in cue-outcome relations in human associative learning.

Authors:  Oskar Pineño; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Does pre-exposure inhibit fear context conditioning? A Virtual Reality Study.

Authors:  Christian Tröger; Heike Ewald; Evelyn Glotzbach; Paul Pauli; Andreas Mühlberger
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.