Literature DB >> 16396016

The relation between auditory temporal interval processing and sequential stream segregation examined with stimulus laterality differences.

Susan E Boehnke1, Dennis P Phillips.   

Abstract

In this study, we examine the effects of laterality differences between noise bursts on two objective measures of temporal interval processing (gap detection and temporal asymmetry detection) and one subjective measure of temporal organization (stream segregation). Noise bursts were lateralized by presentation to different ears or dichotic presentation with oppositely signed interaural level (ILD) or time (ITD) differences. Objective thresholds were strongly affected by ear-of-entry differences, were moderately affected by ILD differences, but were unaffected by ITD differences. Subjectively, A and B streams segregated well on the basis of ear-of-entry or ILD differences but segregated poorly on the basis of ITD differences. These results suggest that perceptual segregation may be driven more effectively by differential activation of the two ears (peripheral channeling) than by differences in perceived laterality.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16396016     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  Role of pattern, regularity, and silent intervals in auditory stream segregation based on inter-aural time differences.

Authors:  David Carl; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Shihab A Shamma; Mounya Elhilali; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Pattern of BOLD signal in auditory cortex relates acoustic response to perceptual streaming.

Authors:  Kevin T Hill; Christopher W Bishop; Deepak Yadav; Lee M Miller
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.288

4.  Auditory deficits of Kcna1 deletion are similar to those of a monaural hearing impairment.

Authors:  Anita Karcz; Paul D Allen; Joseph Walton; James R Ison; Cornelia Kopp-Scheinpflug
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Properties of auditory stream formation.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The effect of visual cues on difficulty ratings for segregation of musical streams in listeners with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Hamish Innes-Brown; Jeremy Marozeau; Peter Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Auditory grouping mechanisms reflect a sound's relative position in a sequence.

Authors:  Kevin T Hill; Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Time course of auditory streaming: do CI users differ from normal-hearing listeners?

Authors:  Martin Böckmann-Barthel; Susann Deike; André Brechmann; Michael Ziese; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.