Literature DB >> 16395948

Ruling out pregnancy among family planning clients: the impact of a checklist in three countries.

John Stanback1, Fatimata Diabate, Thierno Dieng, Telma Duarte de Morales, Stirling Cummings, Mahamodou Traoré.   

Abstract

Women in many countries are often denied vital family planning services if they are not menstruating when they present at clinics, for fear that they might be pregnant. A simple checklist based on criteria approved by the World Health Organization has been developed to help providers rule out pregnancy among such clients, but its use is not yet widespread. Researchers in Guatemala, Mali, and Senegal conducted operations research to determine whether a simple, replicable introduction of this checklist improved access to contraceptive services by reducing the proportion of clients denied services. From 2001 to 2003, sociodemographic and service data were collectedfrom 4,823 women from 16 clinics in three countries. In each clinic, data were collected prior to introduction of the checklist and again three to six weeks after the intervention. Among new family planning clients, denial of the desired method due to menstrual status decreased significantly from 16 percent to 2 percent in Guatemala and from 11 percent to 6 percent in Senegal. Multivariate analyses and bivariate analyses of changes within subgroups of nonmenstruating clients confirmed and reinforced these statistically significant findings. In Mali, denial rates were essentially unchanged, but they were low from the start. Where denial of services to nonmenstruating family planning clients was a problem, introduction of the pregnancy checklist significantly reduced denial rates. This simple, inexpensive job aid improves women's access to essential family planning services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16395948     DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2005.00073.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Fam Plann        ISSN: 0039-3665


  7 in total

Review 1.  Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Sara J Newmann; David A Grimes; Kavita Nanda; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

2.  Performance of a checklist to exclude pregnancy at the time of contraceptive initiation among women with a negative urine pregnancy test.

Authors:  Jaspur Min; Christina Buckel; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Simulated clients reveal programmatic factors that may influence contraceptive use in Kisumu, Kenya.

Authors:  Katherine Tumlinson; Ilene Speizer; Linda Archer; Frieda Behets
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2013-11-01

4.  Does free pregnancy testing reduce service denial in family planning clinics? A cluster-randomized experiment in Zambia and Ghana.

Authors:  John Stanback; Gwyneth Vance; Gloria Asare; Prisca Kasonde; Beatrice Kafulubiti; Mario Chen; Barbara Janowitz
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2013-09-24

5.  Experiences of women, men and healthcare workers accessing family planning services in Malawi: A grounded theory.

Authors:  Idesi T Chilinda; Alison Cooke; Dame T Lavender
Journal:  S Afr Fam Pract (2004)       Date:  2020-10-07

6.  Provider imposed restrictions to clients' access to family planning in urban Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Lisa M Calhoun; Ilene S Speizer; Rajiv Rimal; Pooja Sripad; Nilesh Chatterjee; Pranita Achyut; Priya Nanda
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Menstrual Bleeding Changes Are NORMAL: Proposed Counseling Tool to Address Common Reasons for Non-Use and Discontinuation of Contraception.

Authors:  Kate H Rademacher; Jill Sergison; Laura Glish; Lauren Y Maldonado; Amelia Mackenzie; Geeta Nanda; Irina Yacobson
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2018-10-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.