Literature DB >> 16395702

Use of hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer detected at screening and between mammographic screens.

Solveig Hofvind1, Bjørn Møller, Steinar Thoresen, Giske Ursin.   

Abstract

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with increased risk of breast cancer, but in women undergoing breast cancer screening it is not clear whether use of HT is associated with increased risk of breast cancer detected at screening or between screens (interval cancer). Further, it is unclear whether the use of the HTs that have been common in Scandinavia is associated with higher risk of breast cancer than the HTs used in other countries. Our study was based on data from 296,651 women aged 50-69 years, who participated in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program during 1995-2004. After a mean enrollment time of 3.8 years, 1,512 women were diagnosed with invasive screen detected breast cancer, and 814 with invasive interval breast cancer. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of breast cancer associated with HT use, after adjusting for confounders. Ever users of HT had a 58% increased risk of breast cancer, compared to never users. The HRs associated with HT use were 1.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.29-1.63) for screen detected and 1.89 (95% CI = 1.61-2.23) for interval cancer. The difference between screen detected and interval cancer was statistically significant (p = 0.011). The HR of breast cancer increased with duration of HT use, but significantly more so for interval than for screen detected cancer (use of HT for 5 or more years compared to never use; HR = 2.91, 95% CI = 2.10-4.04 and HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.51-2.50, respectively; p = 0.002). The population attributable fraction of breast cancer due to HT use was 19.8% overall. Ever users of HT tended to develop a cancer of lower grade. No other differences in histological tumor characteristics were observed between ever and never users of HT among screen detected or interval cancers. The estimated risks of either breast cancer overall with HT use are higher in Norway than reported in similar studies from the U.S. HT-use is a stronger risk factor for interval cancer than for screen detected cancer. The increased risk of interval cancer, which may partly be due to decreased sensitivity of mammograms in HT users, remains a challenge in breast cancer screening programs. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16395702     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  9 in total

1.  Breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection among screened women in the Cancer Prevention Study-II.

Authors:  Mia M Gaudet; Emily Deubler; W Ryan Diver; Samantha Puvanesarajah; Alpa V Patel; Ted Gansler; Mark E Sherman; Susan M Gapstur
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Menopausal hormone therapy and subsequent risk of specific invasive breast cancer subtypes in the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Tanmai Saxena; Eunjung Lee; Katherine D Henderson; Christina A Clarke; Dee West; Sarah F Marshall; Dennis Deapen; Leslie Bernstein; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Proportion of invasive breast cancer attributable to risk factors modifiable after menopause.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Kathleen M Egan; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; John M Hampton; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Understanding recent trends in incidence of invasive breast cancer in Norway: age-period-cohort analysis based on registry data on mammography screening and hormone treatment use.

Authors:  Harald Weedon-Fekjær; Kjersti Bakken; Lars J Vatten; Steinar Tretli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-30

5.  Breast cancer incidence and menopausal hormone therapy in Norway from 2004 to 2009: a register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Pål Suhrke; Per-Henrik Zahl
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Bias in Observational Studies of the Association between Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Zahl; Jan Mæhlen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Jordi Blanch; Maria Sala; Josefa Ibáñez; Laia Domingo; Belén Fernandez; Arantza Otegi; Teresa Barata; Raquel Zubizarreta; Joana Ferrer; Xavier Castells; Montserrat Rué; Dolores Salas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Different measures of smoking exposure and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yngve Bremnes; Giske Ursin; Nils Bjurstam; Inger T Gram
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Screening breast magnetic resonance imaging in women with hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Qingjing Feng; Zhiyong Zhang; Yanjun Hu; Zhifeng Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.175

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.