Literature DB >> 16395684

Survival after relapse in children with solid tumors: a follow-up study from the Italian off-therapy registry.

Stefano Ceschel1, Veronica Casotto, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Paolo Tamaro, Momcilo Jankovic, Guia Hanau, Franca Fossati, Marta Pillon, Roberto Rondelli, Alessandro Sandri, Daniela Silvestri, Riccardo Haupt, Marina Cuttini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the increased survival of children with solid tumors, a significant proportion of cases still relapse following treatment discontinuation, and knowledge about the long-term outcome of this selected group of patients remains incomplete.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term outcome of children treated for a solid tumor who relapsed after the elective end of therapy, and to explore factors associated with survival.
METHODS: All patients with the selected diagnoses-Hodgkin disease (HD), neuroblastoma (NB), tumor of the central nervous system (CNS), Wilms tumor (WT), or soft tissue sarcoma (STS)-enrolled in the Italian Pediatric Off-Therapy Registry in the period 1980-1998 were evaluated. Out of 3,927 patients, 694 had relapsed after treatment suspension; 639 were available for analysis. Survival and event-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to assess differences in survival among the various types of cancer considered. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was adopted to explore possible prognostic factors.
RESULTS: There were 335 deaths: most of them (93%) were related to the primary cancer. The overall survival rate after relapse was 38% (95% CI 33-42) at 5 years, and 32% (95% CI 27-36%) at 15 years, while event free survival was 31% (95% CI 26-35) and 26% (95% CI 22-30%), respectively. There were significant differences according to the original diagnosis, with patients with HD doing better, and those with NB, CNS, and STS worse. No improvement of prognosis was evident over time. Post-relapse stem cell transplantation was associated with decreased risk of death only in the first year, not thereafter.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients with solid tumors who relapse after treatment discontinuation have a poor outcome, but significant differences exist according to the tumor types. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16395684     DOI: 10.1002/pbc.20726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  13 in total

1.  Incorporating new therapies in the treatment of paediatric solid tumours.

Authors:  S Gallego Melcón
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Clinical and biologic features predictive of survival after relapse of neuroblastoma: a report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group project.

Authors:  Wendy B London; Victoria Castel; Tom Monclair; Peter F Ambros; Andrew D J Pearson; Susan L Cohn; Frank Berthold; Akira Nakagawara; Ruth L Ladenstein; Tomoko Iehara; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Partial response to carboplatin, etoposide phosphate, and atezolizumab in a pediatric patient with high-grade metastatic tumor with rhabdoid and focal neuroendocrine features.

Authors:  Anna Hoppmann; Adele P Williams; Aubrey Coleman; Clay Tynes; Grant R Williams; Elizabeth Mroczek-Musulman; Jamie Aye; Kimberly F Whelan; Michael R Clay; Sarangarajan Ranganathan; Elizabeth A Beierle
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 4.  Recent progress on tissue-resident adult stem cell biology and their therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Murielle Mimeault; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 5.  Targeting of cancer stem/progenitor cells plus stem cell-based therapies: the ultimate hope for treating and curing aggressive and recurrent cancers.

Authors:  M Mimeault; S K Batra
Journal:  Panminerva Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.197

Review 6.  Recent advances on the molecular mechanisms involved in the drug resistance of cancer cells and novel targeting therapies.

Authors:  M Mimeault; R Hauke; S K Batra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Pediatric developmental therapies: interesting new drugs now in early-stage clinical trials.

Authors:  Margaret E Macy; Kelly K Sawczyn; Timothy P Garrington; Douglas K Graham; Lia Gore
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Anti-GD2 antibody 3F8 and barley-derived (1 → 3),(1 → 4)-β-D-glucan: A Phase I study in patients with chemoresistant neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Shakeel Modak; Brian H Kushner; Kim Kramer; Andrew Vickers; Irene Y Cheung; Nai-Kong V Cheung
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 8.110

9.  Combination of Id2 Knockdown Whole Tumor Cells and Checkpoint Blockade: A Potent Vaccine Strategy in a Mouse Neuroblastoma Model.

Authors:  Lina Chakrabarti; Clifford Morgan; Anthony D Sandler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Recent advances in cancer stem/progenitor cell research: therapeutic implications for overcoming resistance to the most aggressive cancers.

Authors:  M Mimeault; R Hauke; P P Mehta; S K Batra
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.