Literature DB >> 16395464

Road pavers' occupational exposure to asphalt containing waste plastic and tall oil pitch.

Virpi Väänänen1, Eivor Elovaara, Erkki Nykyri, Tiina Santonen, Pirjo Heikkilä.   

Abstract

Waste plastic (WP) and tall oil pitch (T), which are organic recycled industrial by-products, have been used as a binder with bitumen in stone mastic asphalt (SMA) and asphalt concrete (AC). We compared the exposure over one workday in 16 road pavers participating in a survey at four paving sites, using mixes of conventional asphalt (SMA, AC) or mixes containing waste material (SMA-WPT, AC-WPT). The concentrations of 11 aldehydes in air were 515 and 902 microg m(-3) at the SMA-WPT and AC-WPT worksites, being 3 and 13 times greater than at the corresponding worksites laying conventional asphalt. Resin acids (2-42 microg m(-3)), which are known sensitizers, were detected only during laying of AC-WPT. The emission levels (microg m(-3)) of total particulates (300-500), bitumen fumes (60-160), bitumen vapour (80-1120), naphthalene (0.59-1.2), phenanthrene (0.21-0.32), pyrene (<0.015-0.20), benzo(a)pyrene (<0.01) and the sum of 16 PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, 1.28-2.00) were similar for conventional and WPT asphalts. The dermal deposition of 16 PAHs on exposure pads (on workers' wrist) was low in all pavers (0.7-3.5 ng cm(-2)). Eight OH-PAH biomarkers of naphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene exposures were quantified in pre- and post-shift urine specimens. The post-shift concentrations (mean +/- SD, micromol mol(-1) creatinine) of 1- plus 2-naphthol; 1-,2-,3-,4- plus 9-phenanthrol; and 1-hydroxypyrene were, respectively, for asphalt workers: 18.1+/- 8.0, 2.41 +/- 0.71 and 0.66+/- 0.58 (smokers); 6.0+/- 2.3, 1.70+/- 0.72 and 0.27+/- 0.15 (non-smokers); WPT asphalt workers: 22.0+/- 9.2, 2.82+/- 1.11 and 0.76+/- 0.18 (smokers); 6.8+/- 2.6, 2.35+/- 0.69 and 0.46+/- 0.13 (non-smokers). The work-related uptake of PAHs was low in all pavers, although it was significantly greater in smokers than in non-smokers. The WPT asphalt workers complained of eye irritation and sore throat more than the pavers who had a much lower exposure to aldehydes and resin acids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16395464     DOI: 10.1039/b513505b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  5 in total

1.  Comparing urinary biomarkers of airborne and dermal exposure to polycyclic aromatic compounds in asphalt-exposed workers.

Authors:  Jon R Sobus; Michael D McClean; Robert F Herrick; Suramya Waidyanatha; Leena A Nylander-French; Lawrence L Kupper; Stephen M Rappaport
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-07-14

2.  Investigation of PAH biomarkers in the urine of workers exposed to hot asphalt.

Authors:  Jon R Sobus; Michael D McClean; Robert F Herrick; Suramya Waidyanatha; Frank Onyemauwa; Lawrence L Kupper; Stephen M Rappaport
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-07-14

3.  A case-control study of lung cancer nested in a cohort of European asphalt workers.

Authors:  Ann Olsson; Hans Kromhout; Michela Agostini; Johnni Hansen; Christina Funch Lassen; Christoffer Johansen; Kristina Kjaerheim; Sverre Langård; Isabelle Stücker; Wolfgang Ahrens; Thomas Behrens; Marja-Liisa Lindbohm; Pirjo Heikkilä; Dick Heederik; Lützen Portengen; Judith Shaham; Gilles Ferro; Frank de Vocht; Igor Burstyn; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Genotoxic effect of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in asphalt workers.

Authors:  Fatemeh Kargar-Shouroki; Mohammad Miri; Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi; Seyedeh Zahra Hosseini Sangchi; Farzan Madadizadeh
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.068

5.  Silicone wristbands as personal passive samplers.

Authors:  Steven G O'Connell; Laurel D Kincl; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 9.028

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.