Literature DB >> 16395096

Immunogenicity and safety of two doses of tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine in healthy children.

Markus Knuf1, Pirmin Habermehl, Fred Zepp, Wilma Mannhardt, Martin Kuttnig, Pekka Muttonen, Albrecht Prieler, Hartwig Maurer, Helmtrud Bisanz, Nadia Tornieporth, Dominique Descamps, Paul Willems.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combination vaccines against common childhood diseases are widely used, provide an improved coverage, are more convenient and are more cost-effective than multiple injections. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) candidate vaccine in comparison with the separate administration of licensed measles-mumps-rubella (MMR; Priorix) and varicella (V; Varilrix) vaccines.
METHODS: Healthy children 12-18 months of age received 2 doses of MMRV vaccine (3 lots) 6-8 weeks apart (MMRV group) or 1 dose of MMR vaccine administered concomitantly with 1 dose of varicella vaccine, followed by a second dose of MMR at 6-8 weeks later (MMR+V group). Local symptoms (redness, pain and swelling) were recorded for 4 days after vaccination, and fever (any, axillary temperature > or =37.5 degrees C or rectal temperature > or =38.0 degrees C; grade 3, axillary temperature >39.0 degrees C or rectal temperature >39.5 degrees C) was monitored daily for 15 days. Other adverse events were monitored for 6 weeks.
RESULTS: A total of 494 children were vaccinated (371 in the MMRV group and 123 in the MMR+V group. Two doses of MMRV vaccine were at least as immunogenic as 2 doses of MMR and 1 dose of varicella vaccine. After the second dose, all children had seroconverted to measles, rubella and varicella in both vaccine groups, and 98% versus 99% had seroconverted to mumps in the MMRV versus the MMR+V group, respectively. The MMRV vaccine did not induce an increased local or general reactogenicity compared with the separate administration, although a higher incidence of low grade fever was seen after the first dose in the MMRV group (67.7% after MMRV versus 48.8% after MMR+V; P < 0.05), this was not observed for grade 3 fever (11.6% after MMRV versus 10.6% after MMR+V; P = 0.87). After the second dose, no differences in incidence of fever were found in either MMRV or MMR+V groups.
CONCLUSION: Administration of 2 doses of the combined MMRV vaccine was as immunogenic and well-tolerated as separate injections of MMR and varicella vaccine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16395096     DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000195626.35239.58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J        ISSN: 0891-3668            Impact factor:   2.129


  25 in total

1.  Antibody-Mediated Protective Mechanisms Induced by a Trivalent Parainfluenza Virus-Vectored Ebolavirus Vaccine.

Authors:  J Brian Kimble; Delphine C Malherbe; Michelle Meyer; Bronwyn M Gunn; Marcus M Karim; Philipp A Ilinykh; Mathieu Iampietro; Khaled S Mohamed; Surendra Negi; Pavlo Gilchuk; Kai Huang; Yuri I Wolf; Werner Braun; James E Crowe; Galit Alter; Alexander Bukreyev
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Vaccines for post-exposure prophylaxis against varicella (chickenpox) in children and adults.

Authors:  Kristine Macartney; Anita Heywood; Peter McIntyre
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-23

3.  Antibody persistence for 3 years following two doses of tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine in healthy children.

Authors:  Markus Knuf; Fred Zepp; Klaus Helm; Hartwig Maurer; Albrecht Prieler; Dorothee Kieninger-Baum; Martine Douha; Paul Willems
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Vaccine effectiveness evaluation during a varicella outbreak among children of primary schools and day-care centers in a region which adopted UMV.

Authors:  Silvio Tafuri; Domenico Martinelli; Rosa Prato; Cinzia Germinario
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Childhood varicella-zoster virus vaccination in Belgium: cost-effective only in the long run or without exogenous boosting?

Authors:  Joke Bilcke; Albert Jan van Hoek; Philippe Beutels
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Evaluation of Combination Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella Vaccine Introduction in Australia.

Authors:  Kristine Macartney; Heather F Gidding; Lieu Trinh; Han Wang; Aditi Dey; Brynley Hull; Karen Orr; Jocelynne McRae; Peter Richmond; Michael Gold; Nigel Crawford; Jennifer A Kynaston; Peter McIntyre; Nicholas Wood
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Statement on Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella Vaccine: An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).

Authors:  Ben Tan; Shainoor Ismail
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2010-09-21

8.  Hospital admissions for seizure in Italy: a decennial retrospective analysis with a special focus on the burden in the pediatric age.

Authors:  Giovanni Gabutti; Parvané Kuhdari; Sara Ferioli; Cecilia Trucchi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  Primary versus secondary failure after varicella vaccination: implications for interval between 2 doses.

Authors:  Paolo Bonanni; Anne Gershon; Michael Gershon; Andrea Kulcsár; Vassiliki Papaevangelou; Bernard Rentier; Catherine Sadzot-Delvaux; Vytautas Usonis; Timo Vesikari; Catherine Weil-Olivier; Peter de Winter; Peter Wutzler
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Complete DNA sequences of two oka strain varicella-zoster virus genomes.

Authors:  Sueli L Tillieux; Wendy S Halsey; Elizabeth S Thomas; John J Voycik; Ganesh M Sathe; Ventzislav Vassilev
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.