Literature DB >> 16394875

Clinical utility of wireless capsule endoscopy: experience with 200 cases.

Eric L Tatar1, Eric H Shen, Adam L Palance, John H Sun, C S Pitchumoni.   

Abstract

GOALS: To evaluate the indications and diagnoses made with 200 small bowel capsule endoscopies in an academic medical center.
BACKGROUND: Wireless capsule endoscopy (PillCam SB) has recently become available as a new tool in the evaluation of patients with small bowel diseases. Its impact on patient care and usefulness in clinical practice has steadily been gaining ground, yet there are few studies that evaluate large numbers of patients.
METHODS: A retrospective review of wireless capsule endoscopies was performed between September 2003 and January 2005. Reviewed are the indications for the studies, number of complete and incomplete examinations, evaluation of gastric and small bowel transit times, findings made on examination, and the percent of diagnoses made and diagnoses suspected for each study indication.
RESULTS: A total of 200 cases were reviewed. Indications included anemia (66% of cases), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (31% cases), abdominal pain (21% cases), diarrhea (11% cases), and other indications such as evaluation of abnormal radiographic findings or surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease (9% cases). The average patient age was 61.5 years (SD +/- 19.1 years). Males comprised 49% of patients. The wireless capsule endoscopy study completely evaluated the entire small bowel in 87% of cases. The most common cause for an incomplete examination was premature battery failure in 8% of cases. Only 9.5% of studies were normal without findings. Small bowel ulcerations were present in 38% of studies. Vascular ectasias were present in 23% of studies. Overall, a diagnosis was made in 23% of all studies, whereas a diagnosis was suspected based on the findings in an additional 31% of studies. The indication with the highest percentage of diagnoses made or suspected was gastrointestinal hemorrhage, with a diagnostic yield of 65%, followed by anemia 61%, diarrhea 36%, and pain 17%.
CONCLUSIONS: Wireless capsule endoscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool in the evaluation of occult small bowel lesions, and was most effective in patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage and anemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16394875     DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000196185.11802.b2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  12 in total

1.  Factors associated with incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy studies.

Authors:  Mitchell M Lee; Andrew Jacques; Eric Lam; Ricky Kwok; Pardis Lakzadeh; Ajit Sandhar; Brandon Segal; Sigrid Svarta; Joanna Law; Robert Enns
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Surveillance using capsule endoscopy is safe in post-colectomy patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective Japanese study.

Authors:  Minori Matsumoto; Takeshi Nakajima; Yasuo Kakugawa; Taku Sakamoto; Shiko Kuribayashi; Yosuke Otake; Takahisa Matsuda; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Small bowel capsule endoscopy in 2007: indications, risks and limitations.

Authors:  Emanuele Rondonotti; Federica Villa; Chris J J Mulder; Maarten A J M Jacobs; Roberto de Franchis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Usefulness and impact on management of positive and negative capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  George Chami; Mamoon Raza; Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 5.  Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Deirdre McNamara; Edward J Despott; Samuel Adler; Brooks D Cash; Ignacio Fernández-Urién; Hrvoje Ivekovic; Martin Keuchel; Mark McAlindon; Jean-Christophe Saurin; Simon Panter; Cristina Bellisario; Silvia Minozzi; Carlo Senore; Cathy Bennett; Michael Bretthauer; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Dirk Domagk; Cesare Hassan; Michal F Kaminski; Colin J Rees; Roland Valori; Raf Bisschops; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Diagnostic yield and clinical management after capsule endoscopy in daily clinical practice: A single-center experience.

Authors:  P Katsinelos; K Fasoylas; Gr Chatzimavroudis; G Lazaraki; C Zavos; I Pilpilidis; S Terzoudis; G Kokonis; I Patsis; A Beltsis; G Paroutoglou; J Kountouras
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.471

7.  Capsule endoscopy changes patient management in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Reena Sidhu; David S Sanders; Kapil Kapur; David P Hurlstone; Mark E McAlindon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnostic performance of 64-section multiphase CT enterography and CT angiography compared with capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  B He; S Gong; C Hu; J Fan; J Qian; S Huang; L Cui; Y Ji
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Capsule endoscopy: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Tetsuya Nakamura; Akira Terano
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Diagnostic yield of inpatient capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Irving Levine; Soonwook Hong; Dimpal Bhakta; Matthew B McNeill; Seth A Gross; Melissa Latorre
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.