BACKGROUND: Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is involved in the regulation of bone turnover through binding to the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL), and has also been reported to be a potential survival factor for several different cell types. The survival effects are mediated through inhibition of the activity of tumour necrosis factor related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL). Both breast and prostate cancer cells produce sufficient amounts of OPG to be protected against the effects of TRAIL in vitro. AIMS: To investigate the spatial expression of OPG, RANKL, and TRAIL in non-neoplastic breast tissue and breast cancer, and its relation with oestrogen receptor (ER) expression. METHODS: Forty breast cancers (20 ER+, 20 ER-) and five non-neoplastic breast tissue samples were stained with antibodies against OPG, RANKL, and TRAIL. RESULTS: OPG was not expressed in non-neoplastic breast tissue except when colocalised with altered columnar epithelium. RANKL was expressed at the apical surface of luminal epithelial cells and TRAIL was expressed in myoepithelial cells. All three proteins were expressed in some breast cancers but showed no significant association with tumour type. OPG expression showed a significant positive correlation with ER expression (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published study of the spatial expression of OPG, RANKL, and TRAIL in breast tissue and breast cancer. The localisation of each protein was specific and they were not colocalised. This specificity may provide a useful marker of functional differentiation in breast cancer; for example, TRAIL expression as a marker of myoepithelial differentiation.
BACKGROUND:Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is involved in the regulation of bone turnover through binding to the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL), and has also been reported to be a potential survival factor for several different cell types. The survival effects are mediated through inhibition of the activity of tumour necrosis factor related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL). Both breast and prostate cancer cells produce sufficient amounts of OPG to be protected against the effects of TRAIL in vitro. AIMS: To investigate the spatial expression of OPG, RANKL, and TRAIL in non-neoplastic breast tissue and breast cancer, and its relation with oestrogen receptor (ER) expression. METHODS: Forty breast cancers (20 ER+, 20 ER-) and five non-neoplastic breast tissue samples were stained with antibodies against OPG, RANKL, and TRAIL. RESULTS:OPG was not expressed in non-neoplastic breast tissue except when colocalised with altered columnar epithelium. RANKL was expressed at the apical surface of luminal epithelial cells and TRAIL was expressed in myoepithelial cells. All three proteins were expressed in some breast cancers but showed no significant association with tumour type. OPG expression showed a significant positive correlation with ER expression (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published study of the spatial expression of OPG, RANKL, and TRAIL in breast tissue and breast cancer. The localisation of each protein was specific and they were not colocalised. This specificity may provide a useful marker of functional differentiation in breast cancer; for example, TRAIL expression as a marker of myoepithelial differentiation.
Authors: A Truneh; S Sharma; C Silverman; S Khandekar; M P Reddy; K C Deen; M M McLaughlin; S M Srinivasula; G P Livi; L A Marshall; E S Alnemri; W V Williams; M L Doyle Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-07-28 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: H L Neville-Webbe; N A Cross; C L Eaton; R Nyambo; C A Evans; R E Coleman; I Holen Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Christopher R Good; Regis J O'Keefe; J Edward Puzas; Edward M Schwarz; Randy N Rosier Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: T J Yun; M D Tallquist; A Aicher; K L Rafferty; A J Marshall; J J Moon; M E Ewings; M Mohaupt; S W Herring; E A Clark Journal: J Immunol Date: 2001-02-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Allan Lipton; Suhail M Ali; Kim Leitzel; Vernon Chinchilli; Lois Witters; Linda Engle; Donna Holloway; Pirow Bekker; Colin R Dunstan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Eva Gonzalez-Suarez; Allison P Jacob; Jon Jones; Robert Miller; Martine P Roudier-Meyer; Ryan Erwert; Jan Pinkas; Dan Branstetter; William C Dougall Journal: Nature Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: David L Lacey; William J Boyle; W Scott Simonet; Paul J Kostenuik; William C Dougall; John K Sullivan; Javier San Martin; Roger Dansey Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: S S Cross; R F Harrison; S P Balasubramanian; J M Lippitt; C A Evans; M W R Reed; I Holen Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2006-02-17 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Vivian Labovsky; Valeria B Fernández Vallone; Leandro M Martinez; Julian Otaegui; Norma A Chasseing Journal: Cancer Cell Int Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 5.722
Authors: Daniele Santini; Gaia Schiavon; Bruno Vincenzi; Laura Gaeta; Francesco Pantano; Antonio Russo; Cinzia Ortega; Camillo Porta; Sara Galluzzo; Grazia Armento; Nicla La Verde; Cinzia Caroti; Isabelle Treilleux; Alessandro Ruggiero; Giuseppe Perrone; Raffaele Addeo; Philippe Clezardin; Andrea Onetti Muda; Giuseppe Tonini Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-04-29 Impact factor: 3.240