Literature DB >> 16394222

E-mail and the psychiatrist-patient relationship.

Patricia R Recupero1.   

Abstract

E-mail correspondence between psychiatrists and patients raises numerous legal concerns with respect to the ethics of the doctor-patient relationship. Case law has shown that a doctor-patient relationship may be established in the absence of face-to-face contact. Despite this, a surprisingly high number of physicians respond to unsolicited e-mails, some even going so far as to suggest diagnoses or to offer advice. Courts may decide that a doctor-patient relationship exists where a psychiatrist has corresponded with a patient by e-mail. Psychiatrists may be faced with difficult ethics-related decisions regarding unsolicited e-mails from members of the public as well as e-mail from current patients and third parties, such as family members of patients. This article addresses relevant law and ethics guidelines and seeks to assist psychiatrists in making sound, ethical decisions about the professional use of e-mail.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16394222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law        ISSN: 1093-6793


  5 in total

1.  Beyond informed consent: the ethics of informing, anticipating, and warning.

Authors:  Edmund Howe
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2008-10

Review 2.  Training Psychiatry Residents in Professionalism in the Digital World.

Authors:  Nadyah Janine John; P G Shelton; Michael C Lang; Jennifer Ingersoll
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2017-06

3.  Therapeutic emails.

Authors:  Farrokh Alemi; Mary R Haack; Susanna Nemes; Renita Aughburns; Jennifer Sinkule; Duncan Neuhauser
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2007-02-16

4.  Ethical implications of digital communication for the patient-clinician relationship: analysis of interviews with clinicians and young adults with long term conditions (the LYNC study).

Authors:  Agnieszka Ignatowicz; Anne-Marie Slowther; Patrick Elder; Carol Bryce; Kathryn Hamilton; Caroline Huxley; Vera Forjaz; Jackie Sturt; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  How do patients and general practitioners in Denmark perceive the communicative advantages and disadvantages of access via email consultations? A media-theoretical qualitative study.

Authors:  Anette Grønning; Elisabeth Assing Hvidt; Matilde Nisbeth Brøgger; Antoinette Fage-Butler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.