Literature DB >> 16394042

Is cytologic screening an effective surveillance method for detection of vaginal recurrence of uterine cancer?

Amy L Cooper1, Jean M Dornfeld-Finke, Helen W Banks, Diane D Davey, Susan C Modesitt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cytologic screening is commonly used in follow-up of women with uterine cancer to detect vaginal recurrence. The study objective was to assess the efficacy and costs associated with Pap tests in routine surveillance of women with uterine cancer.
METHODS: Medical records and pathology databases identified patients with uterine cancer at one institution from 1990 to 2002. Patients with their cytologic follow-up at our institution were selected for a subset analysis of Pap tests to estimate the number of Paps and associated charges and costs during follow-up.
RESULTS: Seven hundred seventeen women were diagnosed with uterine cancer; the mean age was 60.9 years and the median follow-up was 46 months. A total of 36 women had a recurrence in the vagina; 31 (86%) were apparent clinically, and only 5 (14%) were asymptomatic and identified by Pap test. Women with grade 1 tumors had decreased risk of vaginal recurrence, with an odds ratio of 0.186 (95% confidence interval 0.49-0.712) on multivariate analysis (stage and histology were not significant factors for vaginal recurrence). A subset of 435 patients received cytologic follow-up at our institution, with a median 3 Pap tests/patient (mean 4.25, range 1-24). Estimates based on our data demonstrate that 430 Pap tests are required to detect one asymptomatic vaginal recurrence, and the addition of the Pap test increases the cost of surveillance by $15,142 per asymptomatic recurrence detected (but a charge to insurance of $23,487). Pap tests identified an asymptomatic vaginal recurrence in only 0.7% of this uterine cancer population.
CONCLUSION: Pap tests after diagnosis and treatment of uterine cancer infrequently detect asymptomatic vaginal recurrences and may not be cost-effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16394042     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000194206.38105.c8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Patterns and utility of routine surveillance in high grade endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jessica Hunn; Meaghan E Tenney; Ana I Tergas; Erin A Bishop; Kathleen Moore; William Watkin; Carolyn Kirschner; Jean Hurteau; Gustavo C Rodriguez; Ernst Lengyel; Nita K Lee; S Diane Yamada
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Incidence and cytomorphological peculiarities of lower genital tract infections in vault (post hysterectomy) smears versus pap smears from non-hysterectomy subjects: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Veena Kashyap; Suresh Bhambhani
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2011-10-29

Review 3.  How Do We Follow Up Patients With Endometrial Cancer?

Authors:  Mette Moustgaard Jeppesen; Ole Mogensen; Dorte G Hansen; Stinne H Bergholdt; Pernille T Jensen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  The utility and management of vaginal cytology after treatment for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Akiva P Novetsky; Lindsay M Kuroki; L Stewart Massad; Andrea R Hagemann; Premal H Thaker; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Israel Zighelboim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  What sampling device is the most appropriate for vaginal vault cytology in gynaecological cancer follow up?

Authors:  Lino Del Pup; Del Pup Lino; Vincenzo Canzonieri; Canzonieri Vincenzo; Diego Serraino; Serraino Diego; Elio Campagnutta; Campagnutta Elio
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.991

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.