Literature DB >> 16393797

Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: a four-factor acoustic model.

Shaheen N Awan1, Nelson Roy.   

Abstract

During assessment and management of individuals with voice disorders, clinicians routinely attempt to describe or quantify the severity of a patient's dysphonia. This investigation used acoustic measures derived from sustained vowel samples to predict dysphonia severity (as determined by auditory-perceptual ratings), for a diverse set of voice samples obtained from 134 adult females, with and without voice disorders. Stepwise multiple regression analysis on all voice samples, followed by randomized and repeated cross-validation (random selection of 75% of the original 134 voice sample corpus; 100 iterations) indicated that a four-variable model comprised of time and spectral-based acoustic measures was able to strongly predict perceived severity of dysphonia (mean R = .880; mean R(2) = .775). A cepstral-based measure (CPP/EXP ratio) was determined to be the most significant contributor to the prediction of dysphonia severity, though it is clear that the addition of other acoustic measures (pitch sigma; shimmer (dB); and the Discrete Fourier Transformation ratio, a measure of low versus high frequency spectral energy) add substantially to the accurate prediction of severity. The results are interpreted and discussed with respect to the key acoustic characteristics that contributed to the prediction of severity, the value of identifying a subset of time and spectral-based acoustic measures which appear sensitive to a perceptually diverse set of voices, and the possible use of acoustic models in guiding auditory-perceptual ratings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16393797     DOI: 10.1080/02699200400008353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  12 in total

1.  Laryngeal Aerodynamics in Healthy Older Adults and Adults With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Deborah Matheron; Elaine T Stathopoulos; Jessica E Huber; Joan E Sussman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  [Test-retest variability and internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index].

Authors:  B Barsties; Y Maryn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Acoustic speech analysis of patients with decompensated heart failure: A pilot study.

Authors:  Olivia M Murton; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta; Marc Semigran; Maureen Daher; Thomas Cunningham; Karla Verkouw; Sara Tabtabai; Johannes Steiner; G William Dec; Dennis Ausiello
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  GALP Qualifier Scale: Initial Considerations to Classify a Voice Problem.

Authors:  Marina Englert; Viviana Mendoza; Mara Behlau; Marc De Bodt
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 0.849

5.  Individual Monitoring of Vocal Effort With Relative Fundamental Frequency: Relationships With Aerodynamics and Listener Perception.

Authors:  Yu-An S Lien; Carolyn M Michener; Tanya L Eadie; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Co-Occurrence of Hypernasality and Voice Impairment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Acoustic Quantification.

Authors:  Marziye Eshghi; Kathryn P Connaghan; Sarah E Gutz; James D Berry; Yana Yunusova; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 7.  Voice assessment: updates on perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Perceptual and Acoustic Assessment of Strain Using Synthetically Modified Voice Samples.

Authors:  Yeonggwang Park; Manuel Díaz Cádiz; Kathleen F Nagle; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Patricia McCabe; Donna Thomas; Alison Purcell; Maree Doble; Daniel Novakovic; Antonia Chacon; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Effect of Microphone Frequency Response on Spectral and Cepstral Measures of Voice: An Examination of Low-Cost Electret Headset Microphones.

Authors:  Shaheen N Awan; Mohsin A Shaikh; Maude Desjardins; Hagar Feinstein; Katherine Verdolini Abbott
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.