| Literature DB >> 16393344 |
Flora Y Kong1, Daniel K Ng, Chung-hong Chan, Wan-lan Yu, Danny Chan, Ka-li Kwok, Pok-yu Chow.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Chinese term "Hot Qi" is often used by parents to describe symptoms in their children. The current study was carried out to estimate the prevalence of using the Chinese term "Hot Qi" to describe symptoms in children by their parents and the symptomatology of "Hot Qi".Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16393344 PMCID: PMC1363719 DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-2-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Characteristics of two groups of parents and their children that use or did not use the term "Hot Qi"
| Characteristics | Use the term "Hot Qi" | Not use the term "Hot Qi" | Total | P * |
| Age of Parents | <0.001 | |||
| <30 | 113 (71.1%) | 46 (28.9%) | 159 | |
| 30 – 40 | 429 (85.3%) | 74 (14.7%) | 503 | |
| 40 – 50 | 274 (89.0%) | 34 (11.0%) | 308 | |
| 50 + | 87 (96.7%) | 3 (3.3%) | 90 | |
| Gender of Parents | 0.646 | |||
| Male | 150 (83.8%) | 29 (16.2%) | 179 | |
| Female | 753 (85.5%) | 128 (14.5%) | 881 | |
| Education Level of Parents | 0.186 | |||
| Primary | 138 (89.6%) | 16 (10.4%) | 154 | |
| Secondary | 620 (84.0%) | 118 (16.0%) | 738 | |
| College/University | 145 (86.3%) | 23 (13.7%) | 168 | |
| Place of Birth of Parents | 0.013 | |||
| Hong Kong | 604 (87.5%) | 86 (12.5%) | 690 | |
| Mainland | 280 (80.9%) | 66 (19.1%) | 346 | |
| Others | 19 (79.2%) | 5 (20.8%) | 24 | |
| Monthly Household Income | 0.158 | |||
| (USD) | 26 (83.9%) | 5 (16.1%) | 31 | |
| On social security | 137 (80.1%) | 34 (19.9%) | 171 | |
| <1281 | 287 (82.7%) | 60 (17.3%) | 347 | |
| 1282 – 2564 | 223 (88.1%) | 30 (11.9%) | 253 | |
| 2565 – 3846 | 100 (87.7%) | 14 (12.3%) | 114 | |
| 3847 – 5128 | 74 (90.2%) | 8 (8.8%) | 82 | |
| 5129 – 7692 | 56 (90.3%) | 6 (9.7%) | 62 | |
| > 7693 | ||||
| Median age of Children (IQR) | 7.0 (3.0 to 12.0) | 1.0 (0.42 to 6.25) | 6 (2 to 12) | <0.001 |
| Gender of Children | 0.299 | |||
| Male | 497 (84.1%) | 94 (15.9%) | 591 | |
| Female | 406 (88.1%) | 55 (11.9%) | 461 | |
All data are presented as number (percentage) unless otherwise indicated
* Compared between "Hot Qi" and "Without Hot Qi"group
Figure 1Age of children and the percentage of parents with positive answer of "Hot Qi" or "Consumption of herbal products".
Significant risk factor of "Hot Qi" by using logistic regression analysis
| Variables | B (SE) | P | Adjusted Odds ratio (95% CI) |
| Place of birth of parents (China) – Reference | 0 | 0.031 | 1 |
| Place of birth of parents (Hong Kong) | 0.423 (0.184) | 0.022 | 1.53 (1.06 to 2.19) |
| Place of birth of parents (Other) | -0.438 (0.541) | 0.418 | 0.65 (0.22 to 1.86) |
| Age of children | 0.132 (0.019) | <0.001 | 1.14 (1.09 to 1.19) |
* Total percentage of variance explained by this model = 11.5 %
Figure 2Frequency of symptoms reported by parents.
Risk factors for irritability in children with Hot Qi, univariate and multivariate analysis.
| Variables | Crude Odds ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) |
| Dry eye | 6.82 (3.27 to 14.23) * | 3.73 (1.45 to 9.59) * |
| Eye discharge | 2.28 (1.65 to 3.15) * | 1.34 (0.92 to 1.97) |
| Epitaxis | 1.70 (1.01 to 2.86) * | 0.83 (0.43 to 1.60) |
| Nasal obstruction | 4.50 (2.40 to 8.44) * | 2.65 (1.19 to 5.88) * |
| Runny nose | 1.33 (0.68 to 2.64) | - |
| Gum Swelling | 2.97 (1.86 to 4.73) * | 1.67 (0.91 to 3.01) |
| Poor appetite | 6.56 (4.58 to 9.40) * | 5.39 (3.57 to 8.15) * |
| Yellow face | NA ** | - |
| Yellow sclera | 5.67 (0.94 to 34.15) | - |
| Concentrated urine | 2.77 (1.91 to 4.02) * | 1.42 (0.90 to 2.25) |
| Frothy urine | 13.51 (2.78 to 65.56) * | 4.80 (0.82 to 28.17) |
| Halitosis | 2.13 (1.54 to 2.95) * | 1.40 (0.90 to 2.25) |
| Dry mouth | 2.99 (1.92 to 4.64) * | 2.36 (1.36 to 4.09) * |
| Mouth Ulcer | 1.74 (1.20 to 2.51) * | 1.04 (0.65 to 1.66) |
| Acne | 0.88 (0.57 to 1.37) | - |
| Constipation | 1.16 (0.82 to 1.63) | - |
| Cough | 1.01 (0.65 to 1.55) | - |
| Dry throat | 3.51 (2.27 to 5.41) * | 2.20 (1.27 to 3.81) * |
| Sorethroat | 1.27 (0.91 to 1.77) | - |
* Statistical significance, p < 0.05
** No children with irritability also reported this symptom
Age differences in children given specific remedy
| Median age of Children (IQR) | P* | |||
| N (%) | Given | Not Given | ||
| Water | 784(86.8) | 7.0 (2.0 to 15.0) | 7.0 (3.0 to 12.0) | 0.953 |
| Fruit | 656 (72.5) | 8.0 (4.0 to 14.0) | 3.0 (0.83 to 10.0) | <0.001 |
| Chinese Soup | 637 (70.5) | 8.0 (4.0 to 14.0) | 3.0 (0.88 to 10.0) | <0.001 |
| Five-flower-tea | 521 (57.6) | 10.0 (5.0 to 15.0) | 3.9 (1.0 to 8.5) | <0.001 |
| Selfheal Fruit Spike | 382 (42.3) | 10.0 (6.0 to 16.0) | 4.5 (1.5 to 10.0) | <0.001 |
| Western Medical Doctor | 321 (35.5) | 7.0 (3.0 to 14.0) | 7.0 (3.0 to 12.0) | 0.489 |
| Appetite Stimulant | 252 (27.9) | 3.5 (1.5 to 6.9) | 9.0 (4.5 to 15.0) | <0.001 |
| Abrus Herb | 231 (25.6) | 10.0 (5.8 to 14.0) | 6.0 (2.0 to 11.0) | <0.001 |
| Millet Water | 211 (23.3) | 4.3 (2.0 to 11.0) | 8.0 (3.5 to 13.0) | <0.001 |
| Turtle Jelly | 200 (22.1) | 12.0 (8.0 to 17.0) | 6.0 (2.0 to 11.0) | <0.001 |
| Mulberry Leaf & Chrysanthemum Flower Tea | 198 (21.9) | 11.0 (7.0 to 16.0) | 6.0 (2.0 to 11.0) | <0.001 |
| Chinese Medical Doctor | 182 (20.2) | 11.0 (6.0 to 16.0) | 6.0 (2.0 to 11.0) | <0.001 |
| Mix Milk with Rice Water | 142 (15.7) | 3.0 (1.0 to 6.0) | 8.0 (4.0 to 14.0) | <0.001 |
| Bo Ying Compound | 114 (12.6) | 3.5 (1.75 to 6.0) | 8.0 (3.33 to 14.0) | <0.001 |
| 24-Taste-Herb Tea | 111 (12.4) | 14.0 (9.0 to 18.0) | 6.0 (2.67 to 11.0) | <0.001 |
| Warm Salt Water | 87 (9.6) | 11.0 (7.0 to 14.0) | 6.5 (3.0 to 12.0) | <0.001 |
| Instant Chrysanthemum Tea | 75 (8.3) | 12.0 (8.0 to 18.0) | 6.5 (3.0 to 12.0) | <0.001 |
| Yin Chiao Chieh Tu Pien | 47 (5.2) | 16.0 (10.0 to 20.0) | 6.5 (3.0 to 12.0) | <0.001 |
* Comparing the age of children "given" and "Not given" a specific remedy by Mann-Whitney test