BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) permits high-resolution, real-time, infrared-generated imaging of tissue microstructures by a probe inserted through the endoscope operative channel. Resolution is approximately 10 microm and the penetration depth of the near-focus probe is about 1 mm. The probe can be inserted into the main pancreatic duct (MPD) through a standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography catheter. AIMS AND METHODS: To assess the ability of OCT to identify the structure of the MPD, to distinguish normal and malignant MPD epithelium, and to assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility of OCT images. Multiple sections of neoplastic and non-neoplastic segments of 10 consecutive surgical pancreatic specimens were obtained from patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma who had undergone Whipple resection, and repeated OCT radial and longitudinal scanning was done within 1 h of resection and before pathological examination. We compared 249 good-quality images with 100 histopathological sections. RESULTS: OCT recognized a definite, different pattern in 82.9% of tumor-free and in 97.6% of tumor-involved specimens; sensitivity and specificity for discrimination between adenocarcinoma and normal tissue were 78.6% and 88.9%, respectively. Inflammatory and dysplastic changes of the MPD showed an OCT pattern similar to that of the normal tissue in 53.3% of images. Overall, intraobserver reproducibility ranged from 85.1% to 100% and interobserver reproducibility ranged from 69.9% to 100% and from 89.7% to 100% for tumor-free and tumor-involved segments, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OCT identified the neoplastic and non-neoplastic MPD layer structure and appeared to be a reproducible technique. In non-neoplastic conditions, OCT appeared unable to differentiate between normal and abnormal tissues in about half of the cases.
BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) permits high-resolution, real-time, infrared-generated imaging of tissue microstructures by a probe inserted through the endoscope operative channel. Resolution is approximately 10 microm and the penetration depth of the near-focus probe is about 1 mm. The probe can be inserted into the main pancreatic duct (MPD) through a standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography catheter. AIMS AND METHODS: To assess the ability of OCT to identify the structure of the MPD, to distinguish normal and malignant MPD epithelium, and to assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility of OCT images. Multiple sections of neoplastic and non-neoplastic segments of 10 consecutive surgical pancreatic specimens were obtained from patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma who had undergone Whipple resection, and repeated OCT radial and longitudinal scanning was done within 1 h of resection and before pathological examination. We compared 249 good-quality images with 100 histopathological sections. RESULTS: OCT recognized a definite, different pattern in 82.9% of tumor-free and in 97.6% of tumor-involved specimens; sensitivity and specificity for discrimination between adenocarcinoma and normal tissue were 78.6% and 88.9%, respectively. Inflammatory and dysplastic changes of the MPD showed an OCT pattern similar to that of the normal tissue in 53.3% of images. Overall, intraobserver reproducibility ranged from 85.1% to 100% and interobserver reproducibility ranged from 69.9% to 100% and from 89.7% to 100% for tumor-free and tumor-involved segments, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OCT identified the neoplastic and non-neoplastic MPD layer structure and appeared to be a reproducible technique. In non-neoplastic conditions, OCT appeared unable to differentiate between normal and abnormal tissues in about half of the cases.
Authors: Mohammad S Mahmud; Gray R May; Mohammad M Kamal; Ahmed S Khwaja; Carry Sun; Alex Vitkin; Victor Xd Yang Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2013-11-16
Authors: William R Lloyd; Robert H Wilson; Seung Yup Lee; Malavika Chandra; Barbara McKenna; Diane Simeone; James Scheiman; Mary-Ann Mycek Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Robert H Wilson; Malavika Chandra; Leng-Chun Chen; William R Lloyd; James Scheiman; Diane Simeone; Julianne Purdy; Barbara McKenna; Mary-Ann Mycek Journal: Opt Express Date: 2010-10-11 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Labrinus van Manen; Jouke Dijkstra; Claude Boccara; Emilie Benoit; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Michalina J Gora; J Sven D Mieog Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Amy Tyberg; Isaac Raijman; Monica Gaidhane; Arvind J Trindade; Haroon Shahid; Avik Sarkar; Jason Samarasena; Iman Andalib; David L Diehl; Douglas K Pleskow; Kevin E Woods; Stuart R Gordon; Rahul Pannala; Prashant Kedia; Peter V Draganov; Paul R Tarnasky; Divyesh V Sejpal; Nikhil A Kumta; Gulshan Parasher; Douglas G Adler; Kalpesh Patel; Dennis Yang; Uzma Siddiqui; Michel Kahaleh; Viren Joshi Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2022-08-15