Literature DB >> 16393029

Defensive pride and consensus: strength in imaginary numbers.

Ian McGregor1, Paul R Nail, Denise C Marigold, So-Jin Kang.   

Abstract

Failure (Study 1) and attachment separation thoughts (Study 2) caused exaggerated consensus estimates for personal beliefs about unrelated social issues. This compensatory consensus effect was most pronounced among defensively proud individuals, that is, among those with the combination of high explicit and low implicit self-esteem (Study 1) and the combination of high attachment avoidance and low attachment anxiety (Study 2). In Study 3, another form of defensive pride, narcissism, was associated with exaggerated consensual worldview defense after a system-injustice threat. In Study 4, imagined consensus reduced subjective salience of proud individuals' troubling thoughts. Compensatory consensus is seen as a kind of defensive self-affirmation that defensively proud people turn to for insulation from distressing thoughts. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16393029     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  Race differences in psychopathology and disparities in treatment seeking: Community and jail-based treatment seeking patterns.

Authors:  Kerstin Youman; Amy Drapalski; Jeff Stuewig; Karen Bagley; June Tangney
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2010-02-01

2.  Better, Stronger, Faster: Self-Serving Judgment, Affect Regulation, and the Optimal Vigilance Hypothesis.

Authors:  Neal J Roese; James M Olson
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-06

3.  Authentic and Hubristic Pride: Differential Relations to Aspects of Goal Regulation, Affect, and Self-Control.

Authors:  Charles S Carver; Sheri L Johnson
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2010-12

4.  Narcissism and discrepancy between self and friends' perceptions of personality.

Authors:  Sun W Park; C Randall Colvin
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2013-08-09

5.  Motivation for aggressive religious radicalization: goal regulation theory and a personality × threat × affordance hypothesis.

Authors:  Ian McGregor; Joseph Hayes; Mike Prentice
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

6.  Preliminary support for a generalized arousal model of political conservatism.

Authors:  Shona M Tritt; Michael Inzlicht; Jordan B Peterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Boosting Belligerence: How the July 7, 2005, London Bombings Affected Liberals' Moral Foundations and Prejudice.

Authors:  Julie Van de Vyver; Diane M Houston; Dominic Abrams; Milica Vasiljevic
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-12-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.